Tim Walz Vs JD Vance | Who is Tim Walz? Who is JD Vance? Donald Trump's VP and Kamala Harris's VP

preview_player
Показать описание
You may have heard of Tim Walz and JD Vance, but who are the V.P. nominees and how do they match up?

In this video we’ll compare the backgrounds and 5 political stances of both Tim Walz and JD Vance to get a better understanding of who they are and what they support. If you find this video helpful be sure to like the video and leave a comment.

#jdvance #timwalz #vicepresident #trump2024 #harris2024
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Tim Walz WAS NOT a CSM. He was simply filling that role. His actual rank was Master Sergeant. He wasn’t honest about his rank or time on the battlefield (he was never on the battlefield).

heavymetalcreationz
Автор

He was not a Command Sergeant Major. He held the position on an interim basis but did not meet the qualifications to hold the rank. He deployed once with the National Guard, but that was to Italy (nowhere near combat).

He once claimed to have "stood one night in the dark of night at Bagram Air Base in Iraq". But first of all, Bagram is in Afghanistan, not Iraq. And he was there as part of a congressional delegation, not as a soldier. So he never carried a weapon overseas, and when he was overseas, he didn't know where he actually was.

No one who served in the military in the years following 9/11 would have taken a CSM without a combat patch seriously. And Tim Walz was neither a CSM, nor did he have a combat patch.

CharlesMartin-pqpn
Автор

I’m a vet. Walz was “frocked” (promoted to the next higher rank without getting paid for the higher rank until a later date to complete eligibility. Walz decided to retire after 24 years of service in the Army NG so that he could run (and he was Elected) for Congress. Walz held the rank and WAS serving as CSM when he retired. Plenty of vets go through this (getting “Frocked”). NO STOLEN VALOR HERE.
People also said Walz LIED about carrying weapons of war in battle. Walz did carry weapons when he was deployed to Italy in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. EVERYONE in his unit carried their assigned weapons. Walz latter said he misspoke. The point Walz was making was that assault style weapons do NOT need to be sold in America. Previous assault weapons bans saw a significant decline in mass shootings in America. Republicans don’t want to talk about that. SMH.

spicewood
Автор

Wala was in China like 30 times while in military. His wife loved smelling Minneapolis burn and pollute our beautiful earth. Kind of weird if I do say so.

ant-ekay
Автор

Well one served in the real military Vance and the other one served in the weekend warrior plan Walz.

charlescostello
Автор

You missed a couple of huge points here that are big issues in this election and that is the stance on illegal immigration. Walz supports open boarders and giving amnesty, voting rights, and social programs to illegals where as Vance supports stronger boarders and deporting illegals. Also, you didn't mention Walz radical views on sex change surgeries for minors and the state's rights to take the child away if parent's refuse. Walz also openly supports defunding the police and did so during the BLM riots in 2020 leading to more than 500 million dollar in damages in Minneapolise.

MJFan
Автор

Yo when are you Going to add he lied about his service. He was never a CSM.

PolicyVSRhetoric
Автор

You were a little off on Vance. He wasn't criticizing childless as a whole, but rather people who push legislation that he sees as harmful to children. The full footage with context is out there and he has explained this countless times.

That said, now knowing your liberal bias, you have some of the least partisan videos I've ever seen. Well done! 👍🏽

llamalinguist
Автор

One was a Marine in a war zone and the other was a soldier who lied about being in combat.

TodaysDante
Автор

You got it wrong though, he was not a CSM!! He is however a liar.

christyschroeder
Автор

Vance for policies and better life. The other guy for woke agenda and more collapsing middle class.

Tailionis
Автор

I want to see these 2 fight untill blood is drawn, kinda like back in the cowboy days lmao 🤣

IAM_WORTH_IT
Автор

You tried I give you the credit, but its still evident there is a bias here.

CheapRidesAutoSales
Автор

Tim Walz never completed the process to obtain the CSM rank. He retired as a master sergeant in order to avoid deployment.

katesvensen
Автор

Why would Ukraine cede any space? It's already smaller, and the people don't WANT to be invaded!

d.fiammata
Автор

Alpha8222 Reply and block?

Not splitting hairs, he said it, he knew what he was saying was wrong.
The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 and 2013, are very real.
Not attacking his service. Attacking the lies he told about his service. Not looking to change the condition of his discharge.
Looking for charges to be filed, he has a day in court and if found guilty, appropriate

DirtDart
Автор

I love your videos. They're very informative without too much bias. Occasionally a word like rhetoric is used with negative connotations, but for the most part these are fantastic. 98%!

charlesshelton
Автор

Tim Walz accepted the role of Command Sergeant Major which has 2 years of course work and upon graduation 2 year commitment which extended Mr Walz contract to 2007.

So Mr. Walz knew when he accepted the CSM role he would be in till 2007. What changed, you could say he decided to run for office, or he ran from deploying. He was not a E-1 to E-4.

He was in a E-9 leadership role as a Command Sergeant Major, he left his men. However not illegal, but not much honor.

The Stolen Valor Violation issue, Mr Walz used the Command Sergeant Major rank while he campaigned for office.
Addtionally it was on his Bio till last week when Harris campaign made him correct it.

He did not complete course work or serve two years after.
He retired as a Master Sergeant, his use of the Command Sergeant Major rank pursing his political career is a violation of the Stolen Valor Act. He embellished his rank for political gain.

In a town hall meeting he said how he carried weapons of war in war. He was a E8 he knew what he was saying. Now he comes out and said he misspoke. He used that line to speak from a position of authority. At no time in 24 years was Tim Walz in a war.

It doesn't matter if you serve 3 years or 30 years, combat or non-combat, if you deployed or never deployed, thank you. This is not the issue with Walz, he lied and he dishonored his own service.

Now for all the Capt bone spurs responses.

Trump got a medical deferment to avoid Vietnam.

Biden got a medical deferment to avoid Vietnam

Clinton signed a contract with ROTC to avoid Vietnam. After receiving a high enough draft number that ensured his safety he broke his commitment to the ROTC program.

Similar to Clinton, Walz broke his commitment.

If you're truly interested in the timeline on YouTube search Angry Cop Tim Walz. It explains the military perspective.

DirtDart
Автор

I'm a 70's full time marine and anyone who served in the military(any branch) knows that reserve or part timer is nothing like a full time service man(no knock to them) but your ready status and training are constant and must go in a moment time where as reservist and part timers are trained in basics and are meant for backup fighters they go periodically as to keep up their training so 20 yr reservist maybe close to a deployed 4 yr full timer... training as well as it can be prepared is no comparison to live combat behind the scenes or on front lines....focus more on polices and beliefs and whether it is good or bad for this country use your brains not your emotions

promotinggrandpa
Автор

Your comment on Walz's military history is inaccurate. The Army repealed his command rank due to not completing the contract he signed. He is officially a retired Master Sergeant.

toasterforkeranonymous