Why Ancaps Are Anarchists [Thought Slime Response]

preview_player
Показать описание
Today I explain why Thought Slime is Wrong and why Ancaps are Anarchists.

Thought Slime is a leftist anarchist who is known in breadtube for falsely accusing Xanderhal of running a cult. In ancap circles his video "debunking" anarcho-capitalism is stumbled upon every so often and it only gets more annoying every time.

Videos this is in response to:

Chapters:

00:00 Introduction
00:07 Showing Ancap to be Anarchy Using Slimes Definitions and Responding to the Wage Labour Argument
00:50 A look at why Proudhon would be an Ancap Today
02:03 Displaying the Faults in Slimes Incoherent Ontology
04:04 Slimes Mask Slips, Revealing A Statist Underneath
04:14 Slimes Argument That Capitalism Needs The State Reveals His Distaste for the Poor
04:32 Addressing Rothbard's "we are not anarchists" quote.

Dominos is anarcho-capitalism (ancap), and Ron Paul, Dave Smith, the Ludwig von Mises Caucus / Mises Institute lectures, and Anglo Libertarian Austrian Economics. This is thought slime allegations response, why anarcho-capitalists are not anarchists. Some notable other breadtubers / classical liberals / capitalists / socialists are Xanderhal, Shoe0nHead, Vaush Clips, Destiny, Hasanabi, John Stossel, Sargon of Akkad, Louder with Crowder.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Amazing as always, I'm glad I've discovered your channel, Amazing and Criminally underrated work, please keep posting, and if you ever feel like ending the channel, then please at least consider Archiving all of your videos. Keep it up

A.G-pu
Автор

A rite of passage for every anarcho-capitalist.

thefrenchareharlequins
Автор

i'm glad you pointed out the origins for the whole 'property is theft' thing, almost everyone on the left distorted that and it took a massive blow to their own ideology

bogey
Автор

"From an economically literate perspective"
Chef's kiss.

michaelwoodall
Автор

Zulu does in 5 minutes what Springtime of Nations did in an hour.

dellikakechi
Автор

Luca commenting for the algorithm . Amazing videos, long live ancap.

objectivelycorrect
Автор

From Ego and its Own by Max Stirner:
"Proudhon (Weitling too) thinks he is telling the worst about property when calls it theft. Passing quite over the embarrassing question, what well-founded objection could be made against theft, we only ask: is the concept of theft at all possible unless one allows validity to the concept of "property"? How can one steal if property is not already extant? What belongs to no one cannot be stolen; the water that one draws out of the sea he does not steal. Accordingly property is not theft, but a theft becomes possible only trough property."

cobrageneral
Автор

I fail to see how saying that economics are the only difference demonstrates a connection to mutualism. For example Tucker was famously anti-natural law. Proudhon didn't have a conception of proportionality and changed his rhetoric to be more reformist beacuse of state persecution, not some moral convictions. Later in his life he went on to advocate for a violent seizure of illegitimate property. The only thing that connects us to them is Josiah Warren's sovereignty of the individual. We don't have to establish some artificial connection to a bunch of socialist anarchists to be a legitimate anarchist movement. We appropiated the term libertarian from the followers of Joseph Déjacque despite it still being in use (SoN is wrong when he claims that they weren't using it) and we can do the same with anarchism. Merely mentioning that Rothbard was inspired by Tucker is enough. Ancap is, first of all, Austrian school taken to its logical conclusion + natural law.

Otherwise a great video. Can't wait for your book to come out.

BlackSquares
Автор

comment for algorithm also you saying french names made me chuckle

jangtruel_
Автор

Dude slow down, I'm not trying to be mean, I'm also an ancap but I find it hard to keep up with the rhythm

mariochartouni
Автор

been looking for another good Ancap channel for ages, your content is amazing!

hazza
Автор

You deserve a bigger stage to hand out these truths from

augustleo
Автор

Based as always Zulu 😎👍






(Commenting to help the algorithm)

australiananarchist
Автор

I was always turned off by Proudhon, but he doesn’t seem that bad now. Might not be a Libertarian, but he certainly isn’t the Communist as most portray.

masterofmuppets
Автор

Socialists trying to claim they’re libertarians just because they created the word is funny. Dictionaries change.

EmperorofChinaItwillgrowlarger
Автор

Yoo this is fire my guy. Just a critique, can you please speak a little slower for future videos? Your speech is clear, just a bit fast imo.

twin-gkof
Автор

So, how do you establish and maintain the property rights without which capitalism cannot function in the absence of a state?

BurtReynolds-qpjk
Автор

Property is theft. The needed distinction in terms is private property and personal belongings. Owning a house that you live in to accommodate your need for a roof over your head is not theft. Owning 4 while others have none, giving you the opportunity to exploit their need for survival, makes it a theft. Owning a CNC with 3-10 other manufacturers to produce stuff is not theft. Hoarding 10 CNC machines, forcing this way 30-100 other people "work for you" while you passively receive the "surplus value" to "invest", makes it a theft. It's really not that difficult to grasp.
As to why private property (which is theft and leads to the above that is more or less the basic function of capitalism) is an unjustified hierarchy, first of all, because it's individualistic approach doesn't provide something that can't be achieved through horizontal ownership of the means of production, it therefore has no real gain, while at the same time constantly produces systemically, artificial scarcity, that makes it more difficult for some to cover their basic needs and therefore more susceptible to exploitation from the private owners.
Lastly, a market (a whole bunch of them actually) can exist, without private property.
Rothbard did a psy-op to de-radicalize the most revolutionary term in politics - Anarchism
All ancap theory is just copium in the magnitude of gigatons.

Wookie.Boogie
Автор

People only ever seem to argue against anarcho-capitalism by forming strawmen that barely resemble anarcho-capitalism.

catoticneutral
Автор

Oh Lord thanks for the best laugh I've had in a while

Anarcho-druidry