USA vs China - World War 3 (Day by Day)

In this video, we explore the different scenarios that would lead to a direct conflict between the United States and China, sparking World War 3. There are many different ways a war could be ignited between these two nations jocking for control over global influence. Fight out who holds the upper hand as we break down the strengths and weaknesses of each of these powerhouse nations.

The videos are made by the same team that brings you The Infographics Show.

📝 SOURCES:

All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.

[CS-nnzu]

This is more China positive than I expected. That being said I think you were a bit too optimistic. USA and allies would get more prepared if they saw China moving assets for invasion.

[THECITY]

This is the first video of yours I've really ever fully disagreed with. I find it hard to believe a military That's never fought anyone before would have this much success against America. First time they shoot at anything American it's on, and even they know they don't win

[buzz-es]

Highly biased towards China, they don’t have the quality or capacity to sustain this level of combat.

[tannergordon]

Its absurd to think china would be able to get bombers to hawaii without fighters already being scrambled to meet them.

[lonniemcclure]

Wouldn't the US launch offensive missiles as soon as tracking confirmed missiles inbound to US targets? (Basically similar to the same "launch on warning" policy as with nuclear weapons). They wouldn't be shooting first in that case, and could either take out follow-up launches and/or damage the fleet set to invade Taiwan.

[larrywoolfolkii]

I thought it was already an insane vid.... then the taliban randomly showed up lol

[paul]

I applaud you videos but you are giving the Chinese way too much credit for their military being combat ready. Warfare is a grind on the human mind and without real combat experience- the amount of weapons and personnel matters very little. You could take the world's strongest and best equipped men and throw them out on a football field and they would get destroyed by a team that is physically weaker but has worked as a team for years. Remember that in warfare, the experience and expertise of its leadership is the most important thing outside of logistics- as has been priven by the failed Russian invasion of Ukraine. The United States military has the best logistics in the world and has leadership with combat experience. Considering the last real military engagement China has had at a massive scale is the Korean war of 70 years ago, I can guarantee that their leadership only knows of combat via books and "simulated" warfare. its comical when videos such as this are put out because every enemy or person who hates the USA will chime in with thier opinion on warfare from the bias of hatred and the education of an elementary school student- always fun reading their comments 😂

[equinsuocha]

Keep in mind, it took the US 4 days to sink the USS America super carrier, just to see what it would take. One missile barrage from Chinese ships won’t be enough to “sink” a carrier. Maybe put it out of combat for a few months, but not sink.

[stevenjohnston]

Great video!
10 commercial during the watching of this video! It's as if YouTube doesn't realize that we have other options to choose other than YouTube. I'm close to showing them with Rumble!

[jeffreywasik]

From someone who was in the Air Force, the security forces are very well trained and are very capable. I think you should do more research on Air Force security forces training and base defenses plans

[kevinlindstrom]

The massive thing that I think prevents this from happening is the fact there is not a credible threat of Russia joining the war. We now know that Russia could not significantly impact this war and that will deter China from attacking on its own.

[mauricebeyjr]

I feel like Geopolitico and the Infographics Show have a terrible habit or exaggerating or exasperating situations. No way in hell would a naval invasion of Taiwan would end up costing 1 million casualties. That's the most overblown statement I've heard. The CSCC did war game scenario, you know the one where it said at least 2 US aircraft carriers would be sunk combined with dozens of ships. In that war game, the estimated casualties on China's side was about 200k. Not f*cking 1 million. Whenever you guys watch these videos, please take it with a pinch of salt. These channels are opinionated and spat these absurd statements for sensationalism. Furthermore, the Chinese arent stupid nor are not aware. Keep all of this in mind.

[thefiveofour]

I also don’t think the Japanese would hesitate to come to Taiwan’s aid. The two have had a lot of good will from helping each other recently and Japan still remembers what Taiwan did after the earthquake and nuclear disaster. Japan remembers.

[kevinlindstrom]

As much as the US supported Europe in Ukraine, it would be absurd for Europe not to support the United States in Taiwan.

[superduper]

Before China can hit an aircraft carrier, let’s talk about China being able to locate it. This is not like deer hunting where you see a deer, set sight & pull the trigger. It doesn’t work that way…

[jaybiscanin]

I was tracking until you said the American public wouldn’t support a ground invasion after China struck LA. Most of the public supported the Iraq invasion 18 months after 9/11, and Iraq hadn’t struck the US let along started a war with us.

[lonniemcclure]

Debate in China on whether to attack Hawaii. "“Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It" certainly comes to mind.

[glumour]

hey, you forgot the Chinese ICBM that circled the earth but missed their target by a distance of approximately 30/39 km, , , is there a new update now ? ;(

[btokarski]

I don't see how that could be the bloodiest campaign ever considering Stalingrad had over 2 million itself in one city

[westerncentristrants]

Didn't you already make this video?