An Indepth Look at Using Inverse Trig Functions (Precalculus - Trigonometry 21)

preview_player
Показать описание
A very detailed explanation of Inverse Trigonometric Functions and how to use them in conjunction with Basic Trig Functions. Pretty much all you need to know about using inverse trig functions.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

i love it when you say "i hope I explained it well enough". other teachers say stuff like "YOU don't understand" or "YOU're doing it wrong" and it's amazing seeing a teacher who understands a student's failure is a teacher's failure

ambiguousness
Автор

No one really takes the time to talk about inverse trig functions like this video !!
Just thank you!

majeedfab
Автор

Hi Leonard! I'm just stopping by to say thank you for helping me pass my Differential Equation 2 semesters ago! I forgot to mention this back then, but I couldn't have gotten an A without your help! I hope you are doing well!

Zeltricks
Автор

I am sure I've thanked you before, but THANK YOU SO MUCH! Trig is really kicking my ass, but you are excellent at really explaining things in a way that makes sense in my brain. You are a life-saver. I wish I was taking an in-person class with you!

summerlane
Автор

These videos do an amazing job of hammering in the information after just one watch. I am about to start calc 2 this summer, and reviewing tons of the pre-calculus videos. from inverse functions all the way to polar coordinates. I had a really bad pre-calculus teacher and never properly learned any of this stuff.

j.r.goralczyk
Автор

Thank you so much, I cannot appreciate your hard work and generosity of time and spirit enough. Wishing you all the best

philphymath
Автор

You make learning math achievable and, dare I say, enjoyable. Thank you for helping me to learn to love math.

I sincerely hope you bring back your merch for purchase!

mikedoeren
Автор

Thanks professor for your work...for your generosity...and for you being you....i used to hate math cuz of many variables...but after i took your calss in intermediate algebra i loved math and science...keep on doing the hard work sir...its for us and for you too...and i hope you get millions of subscribers and to always be well and healthy....thank you

BadBoy-lsvn
Автор

BRAVO!!! Thanks for all your hard work Professor L!!

ojingaj
Автор

This man is saving me in math god bless him

macadonards
Автор

sir, pls complete this series as much as possible . but your work is so amazing.

anarchistds
Автор

Professor Leonard, thank you for the lengthy video/lecture on An Indepth Look at Using Inverse Trigonometric Functions in Trigonometry/Precalculus. The problems/examples are straight forward, however focus must be on the Domain/Range on all the Inverse Trigonometric Functions in order to produce correct solutions.

georgesadler
Автор

Thank you so much. My confidence level has has been become the range of Tan(x)
For the 58:43 Mark, I found (- pi/6) by using the cofunctions of Cot/Tan. Tan = Cot(pi/2 - theta). Since -pi/6 is in the restricted domain, I didn't have to think about the ratio.
Idk if you already covered that though.

alemswazzu
Автор

One special case of cot-1 that I was waiting to see if you would mention: cot-1(0), which = pi/2. You can't treat cot-1(0) as a Quadrant I case, because then you'd be trying to evaluate tan-1(1/0). If you draw the triangle to treat cot-1(0) as a cos-1 case in Quadrant II, the triangle will have a zero-length base and simply be a line extending up the y-axis from the origin, ie, at angle pi/2.

willpugh-calotte
Автор

Professor Leonard your videos changed my perspective on math. Can you do a video on doing math for the skilled trades? Stuff that a would do. Or a video on mental math?

dinochickforever
Автор

Am a 7th grader who watches these videos and I learn way to much XD

mclarenp
Автор

I wish you taught physics or there was someone like who taught physics

hythe
Автор

After 40 years, I see this video clip is brand new to me

hoangpham
Автор

How many more videos in this pre calculus series ?

Shashank_Shahi
Автор

why didn't we just make our own triangle when we find the angle for the inverse of csc and sec?

violethill