The Three Acts of the Mind (Aquinas 101)

preview_player
Показать описание
⭐️ Donate $5 to help keep these videos FREE for everyone!

“... Each mortal thing does one thing and the same:
Deals out that being indoors each one dwells;
Selves — goes itself; myself it speaks and spells..."
-As Kingfishers Catch Fire, Dragonflies Draw Flame, by Gerard Manley Hopkins

One of the most important points in the philosophy of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas is that reality is made to be known and the human mind is made to know reality. Things are made to be known because they have forms or essences, and their forms or essences are what we know. The mind is capable of knowing them because we experience things for what they are.

The Three Acts of the Mind (Aquinas 101) - Fr. James Brent, O.P.

Subscribe to our channel here:

--

Aquinas 101 is a project of the Thomistic Institute that seeks to promote Catholic truth through short, engaging video lessons. You can browse earlier videos at your own pace or enroll in one of our Aquinas 101 email courses on St. Thomas Aquinas and his masterwork, the Summa Theologiae. In these courses, you'll learn from expert scientists, philosophers, and theologians—including Dominican friars from the Province of St. Joseph.

Enroll in Aquinas 101 to receive the latest videos, readings, and podcasts in your email inbox each Tuesday morning.

Help us film Aquinas 101!

Want to represent the Thomistic Institute on your campus? Check out our online store!

Stay connected on social media:

#Aquinas101 #ThomisticInstitute #ThomasAquinas #Catholic
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thank you so much for making all this accessible!

albert
Автор

We can know.
Apprehension - reception of forms( mind becomes the forms it apprehends)
Judgement - whether something is or not so( Affirm or deny something)
Reason from a set of judgements to a conclusion

jackdarby
Автор

Thank you, Father. It's very helpful and interesting. Keep up the good work! God bless.

ROMAN
Автор

Amazing! Aquinas is God's gift to us all. St. Thomas of Aq. Pray for us!

jjowens
Автор

Thank you so much for the insightful video!

patriciomendez
Автор

Thanks for this videos very simple the Philosophy and teachings of the Summa Theologica of St Thomas Aquainas is made simple and understandable to young and old Catholics all over the World! There’s a study a survey all over the world of what are the regrets of a dying person in his death bed there are just only two That they have Love a little and travelled a little! To maximize our happiness and experience in this world we have to strive to achieve these two things k!

byron
Автор

I read also that Christianity is a synthesis of Plato’s ideal world of forms and Aristotle’s dialectical classifications. In this way Christ can be seen as the synthesis of Plato’s epistemology (divine nature ascending into heaven) and Aristotle’s empirical classification (living and dying on earth). Having a science, background, I like reading the doubting Thomas story as an Aristotelian empirical experiment!

Diggles
Автор

Thank you for this video!
May our Lord Jesus Christ bless you!

kristindreko
Автор

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:

00:00 🧠 Reality is made to be known, and the human mind is designed to know reality by grasping the forms or essences of things.
01:22 🤔 The mind has three key acts: apprehension (grasping what something is), judgment (affirming or denying something), and reasoning (drawing conclusions from judgments).
03:34 📚 The human mind, through these acts, brings to light the meaning and truth of reality, allowing us to deeply engage with the essence of things, akin to a reader becoming one with a book.

Made with HARPA AI

iqgustavo
Автор

Here is a philosophical critique of the video on the three acts of the mind according to Aquinas:

The video provides a clear, succinct overview of Aquinas' perspective on the three basic acts of the mind - understanding, judgment, and reasoning. However, a more robust philosophical analysis could have strengthened the arguments.

For example, the relationship between understanding and judgment could be explored further. Aquinas sees understanding as apprehending conceptual truths while judgment affirms or denies the relationship between concepts. But does understanding require some implicit judgment, or are these faculties distinct? More philosophical parsing of this relationship is needed.

Additionally, the role of reasoning in moving from premises to conclusions deserved more attention. Aquinas saw this as "discursive" thinking, but how does the mind make logical inferences? What is the philosophical mechanism of deductive reasoning? This act of the mind is complex.

Some reference to potential criticisms or alternatives could also bolster the video. Aquinas' threefold view of mental acts is rooted in Aristotle's philosophy. Analyzing differences with modern cognitive science or the role of intuition along with deduction would make the video more thorough philosophically.

As a very brief introduction, the video captures Aquinas' basic view of the human mind. But further philosophical exploration of the nuances in his thought and how it relates to alternative theories of cognition would enhance the analysis while demonstrating the enduring significance of Aquinas. More rigor is needed to make this overview of genuine philosophical value.

Enigmatic_philosopher
Автор

My Logic subject has become more interesting now that I found Aquinas also has a take on the three activities of the mind.

zoiesantos
Автор

@ThomisticInstitute You mention our 'experience', is our awareness of that experience a function of the intellect ?

paytonseats
Автор

Thank you for explaining this, it really helped. One question though, why are you wearing a Harry Potter cape?

Anna-uskq
Автор

My mind is correlating this with Jung’s cognitive functions. I wonder if he got it from Aquinas.

branver
Автор

'The mind becomes the form' sounds strange to me. Is this different from saying that the the mind abstracts the form from the particular, so that 'the universal form exists in the intellect'?

DoulosEudoxus
Автор

I have a question about aristotelian-thomistic epistemology/metaphysics, as I'm not so familiar with it. If to know something is equivalent to grasping its form, then how does Aristotle explain the knowledge of particulars? We know specific dogs and specific objects. They are form-matter composites, so how can we know them by grasping their form? Doesn't that only explain how we know universals? Or is knowledge of particulars different from the one described here?

yourfutureself
Автор

Actually, reasoning is the process of coming to a judgment,

andrewharmon
Автор

What about intuition? Is that not an act of the mind as well?

gonzalomorales
Автор

But, How do we know we become forms in thought? It's an assertion with no evidentiary proof

wms
Автор

At 1.01 in this item on how the human mind can assimilate reality there's a graphic of a sun-centred system. Of course, Aquinas perceived this entirely wrongly because he thought he observed as reality, a tiny earth-centred universe. Perhaps not a good illustration in this topic.

helpmaboabb