filmov
tv
Utilizing multiprocessing in Python: Passing Functions as Parameters with Pool.map

Показать описание
Discover how to effectively use `multiprocessing.Pool` to pass functions as parameters, avoiding common pitfalls like NameError in Python.
---
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Harnessing the Power of Multiprocessing in Python
When working with Python, we often demand greater efficiency, especially when dealing with computations that can be executed in parallel. In particular, the multiprocessing module is a powerful tool that allows us to achieve this. However, sometimes we encounter issues preventing us from fully leveraging its capabilities. A common problem arises when passing functions as parameters to a child process, leading to errors like NameError. Today, we'll delve deep into this topic, exploring a specific example of such an error and how to resolve it effectively.
The Problem
In our scenario, we want to execute a function, func, utilizing multiprocessing.Pool. The function is designed to handle a tuple of two parameters (list, sorting_function) where the sorting_function is applied to sort the given list. Unfortunately, running this code results in a NameError, indicating that sorting_function is not defined in the context of the child process.
Minimal Working Example
Here's a minimal version of the code that triggers the error:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
When executed, the code triggers a NameError indicating that sorting_function isn’t recognized in the child process!
Understanding the Solution
Step 1: Modify the Function Signature
In the original func, we need to change how we accept parameters. Add sorting_function as an additional parameter in the deserialized input inside func:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Step 2: Update the Main Section of the Code
Next, we also need to update the lambda function used in the main block to accept this new sorting function:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Step 3: Expected Output
Following these adjustments, when you execute the script, you should expect an output showcasing the correctly sorted arrays:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Conclusion
By ensuring that all necessary components, such as the sorting_function, are properly passed to your child processes, you can avoid common pitfalls like the NameError and successfully utilize Python’s multiprocessing capabilities. This adjustment not only resolves the immediate issue but also opens up new roads to efficiently run computations in parallel, harnessing the full power of Python’s multiprocessing features.
If you’re inclined to improve your code’s performance and have parallelizable tasks, consider implementing similar strategies in your projects!
---
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Harnessing the Power of Multiprocessing in Python
When working with Python, we often demand greater efficiency, especially when dealing with computations that can be executed in parallel. In particular, the multiprocessing module is a powerful tool that allows us to achieve this. However, sometimes we encounter issues preventing us from fully leveraging its capabilities. A common problem arises when passing functions as parameters to a child process, leading to errors like NameError. Today, we'll delve deep into this topic, exploring a specific example of such an error and how to resolve it effectively.
The Problem
In our scenario, we want to execute a function, func, utilizing multiprocessing.Pool. The function is designed to handle a tuple of two parameters (list, sorting_function) where the sorting_function is applied to sort the given list. Unfortunately, running this code results in a NameError, indicating that sorting_function is not defined in the context of the child process.
Minimal Working Example
Here's a minimal version of the code that triggers the error:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
When executed, the code triggers a NameError indicating that sorting_function isn’t recognized in the child process!
Understanding the Solution
Step 1: Modify the Function Signature
In the original func, we need to change how we accept parameters. Add sorting_function as an additional parameter in the deserialized input inside func:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Step 2: Update the Main Section of the Code
Next, we also need to update the lambda function used in the main block to accept this new sorting function:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Step 3: Expected Output
Following these adjustments, when you execute the script, you should expect an output showcasing the correctly sorted arrays:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Conclusion
By ensuring that all necessary components, such as the sorting_function, are properly passed to your child processes, you can avoid common pitfalls like the NameError and successfully utilize Python’s multiprocessing capabilities. This adjustment not only resolves the immediate issue but also opens up new roads to efficiently run computations in parallel, harnessing the full power of Python’s multiprocessing features.
If you’re inclined to improve your code’s performance and have parallelizable tasks, consider implementing similar strategies in your projects!