There’s Lots of Space Between the Radical Left and the Radical Right

preview_player
Показать описание


// SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL //

// COURSES //

// BOOKS //

// LINKS //

// SOCIAL //

#JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus #radicalism #leftvsright #lafayette #Q&A #millsseries #politics
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It's admirable how Dr. J. Peterson constantly fights for human improvement in detriment of his health and personal life. All my gratitude for this effort and hope some day people will really listen to what he has to say and follow his advice. Admirable indeed 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻✨️🤗

mcpaolagri
Автор

Incredible how he just sits through two minutes of baseless slander and then dismantles it without getting emotionally riled up because he's heard the same tune a million times before. Lol

Razear
Автор

I have so much appreciation for Jordan Peterson and his willingness to step into the breach. Humanity needs this man, and I am forever grateful for his ability to persevere in the face of constant, ridiculous attacks.

mdainko
Автор

This man and his character, upright and just as it is, has been a model for me long before I even saw him..
It is his character and the very existence of it that is great in this automaton plague.

ramtigerfalcon
Автор

Jordan is a brilliant and beautiful human. The world is a better place because of his contributions to humanity. He is loved, admired and respected by millions. He is the main reason I’m on YouTube. Thank you, Jordan. ✝️❤️

Cinderella
Автор

The Beatles answered this question: “But when you talk about destruction…” people who advocate for just smashing things rather than building structures to nurture those left at the bottom.

amfarrell
Автор

Nothing but respect and admiration for this man. I enjoy the way that Dr. Peterson engages in thoughtful, and meaningful conversation. He doesn't get mad, he doesn't lose control. He chooses his words carefully, and says what he means. Legend.

JAFTW
Автор

Sadly we live in a world where we are raising
generations of truth-deniers. Young people have been so babied in to realms of denial of truth, so much so that they are infuriated when responsibility is placed upon them.

MynameisVi
Автор

Very helpful advice, distancing yourself from radicals is crucial. You should probably fight harder against extremists and radicals on your side, than against the ones on the opposing side.

Marqan
Автор

Peterson is not a divisive person, in the slightest. I can’t understand the thought process of the people that wrote that shite about it.

archiewall
Автор

The "radical left" and "radical right" are holding hands.

areuaware
Автор

When one only sees their own narrow view all they see is their own perspective. There is something worth listening here despite my critiques of him on defining who is reasonable (note, question that within myself a lot).

donaldfrederick
Автор

Wow. Those letters at the beginning show how these students predicate their arguments off of pure fallacy. Are they that lacking in the history of our country and culture? Where are they coming from and what is their basis for these beliefs? That is a sincere question. Is it any wonder that we are so divided?

scottc
Автор

Is it the natural PERSON talking, or is it the IDEOLOGY? That is deep, seriously deep. Thank you.

tipple
Автор

So many people love and respect this man for good reason he has absolutely earned it and then some!

gigakuma
Автор

There's a Lot of Difference between the Far Left today and what I used to consider Left/Liberal. Peterson is NOT any of the things this anonymous Marxist student claims.

bartofilms
Автор

A hallmark of liberal thinking is that humans are perfectible. Thomas Sowell calls this the “unconstrained vision.” I call it the quest for liberation (in a literal sense; liberated from all forms of opposition, internal and external). Thus, perhaps the reason that the Left cannot identify their boundary (a “constrained vision”) is that they see themselves as on a path toward perfection. More is always better, closer to perfection. “Too far” would mean that their ultimate goal is incorrect and their “vision” is wrong.

PermanentExile
Автор

9:14 Watch the man on the right, Brandon Van Dyck (it took me 10 minutes to find his name), do something we've probably all experienced from listening to Dr. Peterson when he says something we've never heard before and we immediately know it's exactly right.

When Dr. Peterson explains a technical reason the left have trouble drawing boundaries, Brandon turns away, looks up, and his face basically goes, "Not bad." He the lowers his head and begins nodding along to the points Dr. Peterson is making. Before that he was in the same position looking right at Dr. Peterson for at least 3 minutes, maybe longer. I've lost count of how many mini-epiphany moments I've had while listening to Dr. Peterson.

HungryTacoBoy
Автор

One of the most cited physiologists in the history of man. A man with an astounding career. He’s devoted his life to knowledge and the inner workings of the human mind. And people don’t even want to hear what he has to say? Because sometimes he hurts your feelings? Preposterous. You should be uncomfortable at all times. You should listen to the words you recoil from. Only a trained communist would act hurt or damaged because someone disagrees with you.

NuclearWinter
Автор

One of the biggest lies in contemporary political discussion is the notion that national socialism and fascism were right-wing. National socialism and fascism were collectivist and revolutionary, and those are left-wing characteristics. Mussolini used to be a revolutionary socialist until during ww1 he decided that somebodies nationality was more important than somebodies class membership. Hitler replaced class warfare with race warfare: different collective, same collectivist ideology. Fascism, communism, and national socialism are closer to each other than to real right-wing movements. The only difference is that they specify their central collective differently: proletariat class for communists, nation for fascists, and race for national socialists.
The only reason that fascism and national socialism are called right-wing nowadays is that the communists labeled them as such, to smear their competition in the struggle for which ideology is the true collectivist ideology.

petersteenkamp