ChatPDF vs PDF-GPT

In this stream we compare two PDF AIs:

We ask it questions on some papers:

Like 👍. Comment 💬. Subscribe 🟥.

⌨️ GitHub

🗨️ Discord

📸 Instagram

#ai #gpt4 #singularity #pdf

[Ascendix_Todd]

Thank you for the video. I believe there's a key point missing though. While ChatGPT-4 excels in general knowledge, the strength of a PDF-focused tool lies in its ability to provide specific insights, like interpreting contract details or product requirements. It'd be interesting to compare how well these tools extract and summarize complex points scattered within a document, not just single references found via an index search.

[RedCloudServices]

The dilemma at 40:30 is perhaps why we need agents. Since GPT-4 is the source LLM Agent 1 would attempt to get the answer from GPT-4 and if it cannot get the answer from your custom PDF corpus

[joshmx]

Friend, Does this read documents and summary for us, do you have any website reading pdf? any considerations?

[pequodexpress]

Is it possible to delete folders and files from ChatPDF?

[intelligentautomation]

For some one who knows how to code with openai API, this is really easy to do. I suspect there will be dozens of such websites very quickly, but not sure how long will the free access last because each PDF consumes a lot of tokens.

[draken]

ChatPDF is an interface, not a model or LLM.

All its doing, is opening up the PDF, and dropping snippets it from it, into calls to openAIs LLMs.

[tonyseno]

Hello, I just wanted to say that I really enjoy your content on YouTube. However, I've noticed that in some of your videos, your head can sometimes block important parts of the content. It can be a bit distracting and take away from the overall viewing experience. I was wondering if you could perhaps adjust the camera angle or position to avoid this in future videos? I think this small change could really enhance the quality of your videos. Thank you for considering my feedback.

[alexoneday]

Chatpdf couldn't read any of my pdf files after multiple attempts. Provided a lot of absolutely unrelated answers. I didn't understand why ...

[ThaiyaWaronja]

So whch one was the best at READING AND UNDERSTANDING A PDF ? not who answered questions correct about the topic, what was important is the ability to read and comprehend a pdf.

[danielthen]

What is the vision and mission of this chat pdf and pdf-gpt and chat gpt 4 actually and is this a combination of google and youtube and language translation and designer logos and fashion and fashion graphics and stock trading and gamers and what's up and online shop and the latest second generation of

[alaaddindundar]

Out of topic, but how do his eyes get in front of his glasses? In one second I see glasses' frame, in the next second his eye pops up front 😅

[sonGOKU-gyrg]

How could I setup my camera like you, I mean with pdfs on background😢

[wildclaw]

ChatPDF and PDF-GPT were sometimes able to find the relevant information from the PDF files, but they also had some errors and limitations. ChatPDF was more succinct and did not error out, while PDF-GPT had a better UI and more references. But neither of them could match GPT-4's general knowledge and accuracy. So I would say GPT-4 is the best platform for answering questions about any topic.

[hwoccurrence]

I have tried ChatPDF and GPT4 and for most subjects GPT4 is the way to go, but for other ChatPDF does it better. Also for research you would need it to read pdf files etc.

[TheDiversia]

Да, он не изучает весь документ а только маленькую часть и остальное придумывает. Анализ большого документа он не сможет сделать

[klammer]

How about a very recent paper….something within the last month or so and/or something not on the internet as believe all these papers are part of the Arxiv dataset that is in the pre training for gpt4 so it’s not really apples to apples here….like the sparks of AGI paper just released…not sure gpt4 would know anything but if you add he papers to the other two, it would be able to discuss and Q&A over it….just pointing that out…..great comparison though🥳🦾🤓 1:14:05