Supreme Court overturns decades-old Chevron decision

preview_player
Показать описание

#supremecourt #chevron #news


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Isn't there a precedent or a legal principal which says that if a statute is unclear, it is, by default, unconstituional? If no reasonable person can understand a law, how can it be valid?

studlord
Автор

If lawmakers want something they need to put it in law. That's their job. You can't ask the courts to do everything.

Anurania
Автор

Government agencies have been abusing the Chevron act for years: these agencies don't even try to follow federal law when there is something they want to do...in fact, they violate their own rules and regulations and use Chevron as an escape hatch. Nevertheless..Nevertheless, I don't believe that it is the SC job ti fix this problem...Congress should have taken action years ago to reign in these administrative agencies which report directly to them...by doing this the SC has created a (Coomas) situation..my word for contradictory and confusing outcomes...stay tuned"its going to be a bumpy ride".

farrisguinn
Автор

You paint it as a win for conservative and business interests when it is rather a win for representative based policy over agency leadership cronyism whiplash every 4~8 years.

jwo
Автор

That Chevron Law made Bureaucracy the fourth and most powerful branch of government.

miken
Автор

He didn’t organize anything he told everyone to stand down before the J6 ever started it was on television.

Rustybucket
Автор

Tyranny suffered a big setback today with the elimination of Chevron Deference. 🚀

backcountyrpilot
Автор

And how about the fun new rulings about the Securities Exchange Commission?

ReginaJune
Автор

Glorious! And, btw, its not just conservatives and businesses that should be happy. This is a win for our Constitution.

bobward
Автор

The problem is that these governmental agencies consider actual experts to be "tainted" and refuse to hire them, choosing instead to hire a "pure" candidate who knows nothing about the industry he or she is supposed to regulate.

barbarakiewe
Автор

This is a victory for all of the citizens. Government is supposed to be restricted.

AnAmericanPatriot
Автор

If you like lead poisoning, food poisoning, unsafe planes, toxic companies in your back yard, un democratic unscrupulous lower courts deciding how much cancer causing chemicals are in your water, this is a great day for you.

rudewalking
Автор

Imagine believing a building is more important than the multiple cities looted, burnt, and rioted.

vajona
Автор

Maybe some of you do not realize how government agencies "adopt by reference" many non governmental consensus standards. I won't name any names. Many of the non governmental consensus organizations are staffed by people that stand to make a buck by selling their products, or expertise, when their consensus standard is adopted.

Автор

State agencies are given their power by these federal agencies and should be shut down as well. ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!! END ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!😊

InannaIshtar
Автор

Alito's corruption has exceeded that of Thomas! Thomas's interest lies in his wife's income from her leased land. The explanation is lengthy but is outlined in snippets as follows: "The wife of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito leased a plot of land to an oil and natural gas company while the judge was weakening the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency, report says". "In June 2022, Justice Samuel Alito's wife leased a plot of land in Oklahoma to an oil and gas company.
Alito's wife stands to earn 3/16ths of the money generated from the land should extraction prove successful.
Alito in several rulings before the court has been part of majority decisions to reduce the scope of the EPA." "But the oil and gas lease troubles many environmentalists given Justice Alito's role in weakening the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency in several cases that have come before the court."

TheGothicdolphin
Автор

In Florida, arbritrary and capricious rulemaking by unappealable private entity step up for students happened no less than four times this year. In a single year. This isn’t just rules change every 4-8 years. This is rules change every quarter or more. Who can make decisions with that kind of volatility?

littlegreen
Автор

What does the government doing its job. Have to do with conservatism?

gregorholmes
Автор

The main purpose of a company is to maximize profit at any costs. Without strict regulations, consumers/workers will pay the price.

vincenttiene
Автор

Oh wow project 2025 is already happening

violentmelody