Sec 27 of the Evidence Act - more misconstrued than comprehended - Justice V. Ramkumar

Показать описание

Legal Empowerment Through Interaction - Lecture Series [#LETILS 283]
#Shyam_Padman_Associates | Advocates & Legal Consultants
___________________________________________________________________________
Topic: "Sec 27 of the Evidence Act - more misconstrued than comprehended"

Speaker -Justice V. Ramkumar
Former Judge, High Court of Kerala.

| Send your Queries and Suggestions at |

| Webinar @Zoom held on Saturday 4th October 2023 , 05:30 PM India |

| Contact Us |

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

Now, after this webinar by Justice Ramkumar, Section 27 is rather more comprehended than misconstrued, till the time another such Ramananda Nandlal Bharti verdict is pronounced😊

LawbyGM

Sir, Just read ur article online, now I am watching ur video for more clarity😊Thank you. Research started from Kottaya case...

advasif

Distinctive dissection and display of Section 27 of Evidence Act.

advocateharikumar

Justice ram sir persoective is biased to secure conviction and under the presumption that accused is guilty. Just think that police is always guilty and the necessity of Panchanama will arise

alexissudhakar

Dichotomy still lies, accused should be immune from self-incrimination and police/ investigation can not be taken as God qua planting of evidence conveniently implicating accused. However, evidence act also says that certain evidence within own knowledge has to be taken out from him only irrespective of its position but again accused is no-convict till he is proven guilty. Videography during discovery of incriminating material under advice of accused might be a good midpath to give right effect of sec 27 of EA

jituburman

Sec 27 of the Evidence Act - more misconstrued than comprehended - Justice V. Ramkumar

Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act | Explained | Lecture 22 | Ft. Pankaj Sinhmar

Section 27 of Evidence Act | Information received from Accused may be proved | Law of Evidence

Sec 27 of the Evidence Act - more misconstrued than comprehended - Justice V. Ramkumar

Lecture 55 - Section 27 - Evidence Act

Section 27 Evidence Act

Section 27 of evidence act | discovery statement |full explanation with case laws and examples.

Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act,1872 for LLB LLM Bar exam Judiciary PCSJ SEBI AIBE

[EVIDENCE] Rule 130 Section 27 of the Rules of Court

What is Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act ? | TAMIL

Sec 27 Evidence Act, 1873 - Panchnama Case Law

SUPREME COURT LAID DOWN LAW OF RECOVERY UNDER SECTION 27 INDIAN Evidence Act| LIMITED ADMISSIBILITY|

Section 27 Of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 || Confessions to Police Officers (Discovery of Fact)

Supreme Court Delivers Important Judgment On Section 27 Of Indian Evidence Act

Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act by Anto Sebastian, CHRIST (Deemed to be University)

Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act | Discovery Statement | Requirements to Bring Case Under S. 27

Leading to Discovery u/s 27 Evidence Act I Indian Evidence Act,1872 I Legal Academics

EVIDENCE ACT- SEC- 27 ONWARDS

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment | Sect 27 | Indian Evidence Act | Judicial Exams | By Rakesh Kapoor

Sec 27 of evidence act in Tamil confession statement by accused Recovery & Discovery case proper...

RECOVERY U/SEC. 27 EVIDENCE ACT PLANTING & CROSS EXAMINATION KRISHAN IPC CRPC NI ACT DV ACT NDPS

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Master Class | Lecture 19: Confession Part 3, Sec. 27 Discovery Statement

Section 27 Indian Evidence Act full Explanation with Case Laws and Examples

Section 27 Evidence Act and discovery of facts

Sec-27 INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT- FACTS LEADING DISCOVERY