Security Flaws In Your Computer Chip Leaves You Vulnerable

preview_player
Показать описание
The security flaws are in the chips, which is every computer known to mankind. These chips are a bandwidth, or a bridge for hackers to come in and get information out of your computer. Ring of Fire’s Mike Papantonio and Peter Mougey discuss this issue.

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Be sociable! Follow us on:

This Intel story gets weirder and weirder. Okay. You got 32, you got 32 class actions filed against Intel and what it's about in addition to that, there's a derivative suite that I'd like to talk about.

[crosstalk 00:00:16] securities.

Yeah. So, here you got, you've got security flaws. Talk about the story. Lay it out a little bit.

The security flaws are in the chips, which is every computer known to mankind. I don't care what you own, whether it's Intel, Advanced Micro Devices, Arm Holding, every one of those contains these chips. These chips are a bandwidth or a bridge to, for hackers to come in and get information out of your computer. So, then, Intel says, "Well, I gotta fix." So, they put a, kind of a bandage over the bridge so hackers can get in and steal the information, but that slows down the computer.

Well, if you just spent a couple grand on a computer-

Is it significant?

Oh, yeah, it's slow, it slows the whole thing down.

Okay.

Enough to warrant 32 suits. So, you buy a computer, it slows it down, you have people getting their information hacked. So, you have, as you mentioned, you have 32 lawsuits that fit into three categories. One is, I bought my computer and it's significantly slow or with the fix than what was advertised. I didn't get what you sold me. That's one.

Number two is the derivative suit, which the derivative suit is the company essentially suing the officer and directors-

Stockholders.

Right.

Stockholders.

So, it's a derivative with the company stockholders suing the officers and directors for making terrible business decisions.

And, the third one is the securities suit, what I love, which means that they knew about, the company knew about it, didn't disclose it. So, people that bought stock paid inflated. But, here's what I love. The CEO, I'm not gonna pronounce his last name correctly, Brian-

Krzanich.

Zrzanich. He sold 889,000 shares on November as part of his plan. He made 39 million dollars-

Oh, yeah. But, he knows it's coming.

-for selling his securities while he knows this is all under way.

He knows it's coming.

Yeah. He knew as of July 27.

Okay.

Months before.

So, here big Brian Krzanich, he says, "Wow! I gotta keep this quiet. While I keep it quiet, I'm going to go ahead and sell stock and I'm gonna make 39 million dollars."

Well, okay. Who got hit ... To understand, you handle derivative suits, you've handled them for years, a derivative suit is when the shareholder says that the conduct of management is so bad or it's so corrupt-

You've ruined my-

-you've ruined the value of my stock, right? Okay. So, what could have ... So, this guy knows that his stock is gonna tank if he doesn't secretly go do this as quickly as he can and if this information gets out then he's not gonna make 39 million dollars.

This whole compensation system is what's wrong with Wall Street and corporate America. We pay our CEO's, in large part, most of their compensation comes from options in stocks, which means I'm gonna give you stock that you can execute and buy a year or two down the line and the thought is their goal [inaudible 00:03:05] with the company. Get the stock price up. But, what it really ends up is, at any means possible drive the stock price up as much as humanly possible-

And sell it.

-keep the bad news quiet while I sell my ... Exercise my options and then liquidate. So, what he's done is he's ... And, he's saying, "Aw, this is just part of a regular plan."

He said it was coincidence. It was just a coincidence. I didn't know anything about all this.

But, you know what? If you know something bad's coming, you can't sell your ... I mean, 39 million dollars, which is more money than 99.99% of the population's ever gonna dream about making in a lifetime. He sold, in one liquidation, and pocketed all the while knowing that his shareholders were about to get crushed and he sold it.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Unfortunately in USA the corruption isn't a bug but a feature.

johntrevy
Автор

so why isnt he in jail for insider trading

kinkong
Автор

The flaw is with pipelining principle which is shared amongst processors. Things happen so fast Inside processor the big bottle neck was transferring data in and out.

Pipelining was a solution to this by having circuitry that preforms fetching the next set of instructions to be processed whilst the current data is being executed. This evolved into hyperthreading where you effectively 2 virtual processors by have 2 hardware threads and one logical processor core.

This flaw comes as a side channel attack where by there leftovers from previous data processed that can leak information including things like initialization vectors for encryption or possibly even the keys them selves.

A easy example of side channel attack is a timing attack. In some password authentication algorithms there was a time difference between a good password and a bad password. Meaning if you entered the correct password the machine would respond faster than if it was the incorrect password even by a per
character basis. Computers have highly accurate and large counters that make this easy to detect.

This is call a timing attack which is a side channel attack where the password is leaked by the time it takes to authenticate a password.

In Intels defence you have to remember this the x86 micro arch is over 30 years old where it was never envisaged these types of attack would happen. These machines where never designed to be connected together to a state where you would have strangers who would run malicious code.

SionynJones
Автор

In other news. Jeff Sessions just resigned! Good riddance!

vegasflyboy
Автор

This information isn't entirely accurate as the performance degradation is almost next to nothing in newer computers. In older ones maybe, but this affects everyone, not just Intel. Amd, Qualcomm, apple, etc. and it's not just the chip makers that need to patch this it's the motherboard manufacturers and OS makers. I can almost guarantee you that if you are reading this you own a device that is affected by this. and the reality is is that we're going to keep finding security flaws in all future products. The best way you can protect yourself is to update your devices and don't do sketchy things.

woodtvnetwork
Автор

You mean meltdown and spectre? 😕 Those vulnerabilities have been on going

hasher
Автор

and then the Russians break into your computer, wow

TheAngryRepublican
Автор

Insider trader goes on all the time ...even congress gets in on this by the privileged info they get in the line of duty but nobody goes to jail except Martha Stewart

xadamdudex