Bergson's Holographic Theory - 22 - Tesla-2, What is a Field?

Part 22
What is a Field?

*- On the nature of a Field as non-physical - an exposition of Dollard and Ken Wheeler

*- The strange field of the magnet, counterspace, the dielectric inertial plane

*- Space as the expression of the ether field, of magnetism

*- QM and the double slit - what IS a "photon?" Burying the EM nature of light.

*- The Field as non-physical, and the Mind/Matter relation in the context of action.

Feynman...
Interview:

Book - with magnetism as virtual photons:
QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, 1985

Some Ken Wheeler videos:

AC generator as inverse magnet

Magnetism…

Atomistic fallacy - at 9.00 explains the electron microscope

Counterspace and capacitance

Magnetism - ferrocell images and gyromagnetic precession

On a field

The inertial plane

Attraction/repulsion

On Steinmetz:

[slickwillie]

Finally somebody explains Ken Wheeler's theory. Definitely worth replaying several times.

[armandoflores]

Another mind opening lesson. Thank you very much Steve.
Great work !

[deepblack]

Something very very interesting and hardly mentioned anywhere is what I can only term 'Jump Travel' - point to point travel which has been mentioned by Dollard in a video about the Integraton. (this also come up in some UFO sightings, whether they are alien or gov I leave to you) Dollard said that in looking at it it seemed to be a transporter, a doorway, step in and walk out into another one similarly tuned. So the question, if there is anything at all to this, is - are you entering into Counterspace or a yet unknown field modality of Counterspace? This relates directly to spooky action at a distance in QM (as well as magnetic fields) Do points in counterspace exist and can you travel in counterspace? I do not believe that you can travel in time within the constraints of Space as described here but we do not understand the Implicate Order/Counterspace. Fascinating...

[slickwillie]

Finally a clear explanation of this. You are so amazingly correct. I will tell you a story. I encountered a PhD online who agreed to send me a couple of his papers free, since I couldn't afford them. He had proven that light cannot be a particle because the electrons in the photoelectric effect receive impulses always at 90 degree angles to the incident light wave. This is the behavior of a wave, not the behavior of a particle. Somehow (I'm not sure exactly how) this must imply that photons in the double slit experiment are not particles either, but waves. When you hinted at DeBroglie's idea of a guiding wave you were touching on "pilot wave theory", the second most popular interpretation of QM. That is exactly their thesis. I feel vertigo from getting so close to the truth.😀

[tsenotanev]

also ... it has been explained by numerous people what the ferrocell really shows ... including an explanation by the author of the device
in the ferrocell, magnetic lines of force are being "materialized" by the nano particles which form relatively long filaments perfectly aligned with the magnetic field... each of these filaments then is seen reflecting light from one of the LEDs on the periphery depending on the angles it concludes with the line of vision and the line of illumination according to the laws of linear optics
the ferrocell patterns are not showing lines of force ... contrary to what ken wheeler likes to affirm .. this is just one of the numerous fallacies he likes to perpetuate

[STONE]

Ken wheelers ideas are spot on, even though he is full of himself he is a fn genuis

[windsock]

"Anything that you can only define by an effect over a period of time is just a description. Define a unicorn by saying this "thing" leaves footprints in the grass, but we have never seen a unicorn." Good stuff, Steve. Your YouTube series is an intriguing treasure. I've watched all the episodes at least once and expectantly await the next ones. Please keep them coming!

[Carmilaish]

after having seen the whole series of your videos I have been reviewing some of them again. Regarding EM and Ken I want to mention here Fractal woman (yt channel; good tips there) who is also in considerable harmony/sintony with ken wheller; and on the question of the field she herself created this new definition: 'a field is a region of the universe, where each "location" in the FIELD OF VIEW, is assigned a physical quantity'. PS: great work Stephen Robbins; thanks for your video series. (note: attention, about the case of magnetic fields 41:11 your vid, may not be so; she demonstrates this in her video - 'ken says the darndest things'; it doesn’t compromise Bergson, but "it does ken"; some of his observations, to be more exact. Just a side note).

[slickwillie]

What does "hypertropoidal" mean?

[slickwillie]

I have a question you may be able to answer. If space is being created by an expanding magnetic field, can we measure this increase in space somehow?

[greglives]

I think Scientific Lee is closer to what is going on in a magnet than Theoria.