Surface Laptop Studio 2 vs MacBook Thickness

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Luckily in this edited version you didn't dent your laptop

ThatsSoCrazy
Автор

Alienware gaming laptops have entered the chat

rowantardik
Автор

I wonder if anything happened to the surface while recording one of these clips…

gingerphoenix
Автор

Literally like 3 shorts ago I got recommended the next video that you posted about denting your 3000$ macbook

vipereaper
Автор

His “chunky” computer dose not thermal throttle after 2 mins

Silverone_
Автор

It's also an arm based processor and has to emulate all non arm64 apps. Meanwhile, the studio runs them natively. Significantly better performance by default in the studio

shawnheatherly
Автор

Never thought laptops were too thick. I saw a gaming laptop 10 years ago and yeah, too thick for daily use but man, I just need something with good battery life, can run the apps I use comfortably and won't burn my lap if I dare to run a YouTube video. The 2020 intel MacBook Air I have is impressively thin but I miss magsafe, proper USB ports and it struggles if I have discord and YouTube open at the same time.

RetroOnSpeedDial
Автор

i cant believe he reversed time after denting his laptop to make this video, respect ⬆️⬆️

Blost
Автор

He must've meant "a 1/4 smaller"😂😂

saileshrajesh
Автор

The surface is way too heavy for my taste. I have had to deploy a couple of the first and second gen and that’s really what stuck with me.

Dubious_Pastimes
Автор

The only real reason i can think of for Surface Laptop Studio is gaming, or maybe if you need to use proprietary Windows programs.

I will pick a maxed out macbook any day, i mean it is probably more expensive, but Surface is also not exactly cheap

junzhengca
Автор

Also, there are massive spec differences - the Lenovo beats it on almost every graphic and spec test... It even has better ram because it's ddr5 versus apples goofy ram

Siddeshlowk
Автор

And it has an actual graphics card in it, not an integrated one

suvojitpal
Автор

If it’s a fourth less as thin he’s technically not wrong. Maybe it was poor wording

idohearthatersdgk
Автор

+ it houses an actual graphics card instead of an APU

DeviciWasTaken
Автор

Breaking news: A normal laptop can play games as well as work while the MacBook can only do work.

confusinggameplays
Автор

Let's be honest right now, the MacBook has no other fucking purpose execpt work, " tHe FiRst GamIng MaC" Can't even run games the only games it can run are minecraft and roblox, like bro if I'm paying 3k for a laptop it better have a rtx 3080 intel i9 11th gen 2 tb Nvme, and that shit needs to be on highest quality, like bro when you accidentally close the MacBook lid to hard the screen cracks.
Edit: I forgot to mention that Apple announced in their event that the new MacBook is for gaming even the game they showed on their own damn event didn't run..

Flemuxis
Автор

Bro is really comparing pc performance by ram 💀💀💀

sLorentZs
Автор

I bet his dad only uses that MacBook as a toaster.

Cosmetic_Astro
Автор

In terms of the tactile sensation of bulkiness, a 30% increase is significant, especially when we acknowledge that laptops cannot be infinitely thin; there is a minimal thickness that is universally expected. To illustrate, consider the minimum conceivable thickness for a laptop to be 60mm (for easy maths). In this context, a laptop measuring 100mm in thickness (which is 60mm plus an additional 40mm) would feel four times bulkier compared to one that is 70mm thick (60mm plus an extra 10mm).

Wolf-
welcome to shbcf.ru