The Jwst Reveals New Evidence: Is the Big Bang Theory Really Wrong? What’s behind It?

Is the image of the origin of the universe that we've had until now actually wrong? Discover the fascinating new clues and find out what really lies behind these revolutionary insights! Get ready for a journey into the depths of the cosmos that could forever change our understanding of the universe!

[Rolfthewild]

It's kinda refreshing to see scientists have a melt down over what really happened in the beginning. Proves that scientists are just as confused as we are about the universe but man I wish they would stop pushing it down kids throats in school because it seems almost every year something changes.

[rodolfocaroselli]

Dear sirs, thank you for your very good videos, however, please tell me this, if possible. 1) It seems that everyone agrees that Big Bang took place 13.8 billion light years ago. 2) Therefore, do you not think that the only definitive evidence against Big Bang theory would be the discovery by JWST of objects "farther" than 13.8 billion ly? 3) So far the farthest objects discovered by JWST are 13.5-13.6 billion ly far, but it would be important to know if JWST has the technical ability to look farther. But no one says how far it can loook. If there were a galaxy 15 billion light years far, could JWST see it or not? If WJST can see objects farther than 13, 8 billion ly but it does not see them, would it not be an evidence "in confirmation" of Big Bang theory?

[WILLIAMMALO-kvgz]

Over the years I have yet to encountered one shred of evidence that time or existence has a beginning or will have an end. "Energy cannot be created or destroyed. only altered or transmitted." Thanks for this well thought out video.

[donbrunton]

It actually makes sense if you consider density levels in an early universe, that super massive black holes would have bypassed the star phase and formed directly from gas.
It's possible, they formed spontaneously at the end of the unification epoch. What if star formation began around pre- existing black holes? What if the excessive light we're observing, is not starlight, but feeding singularities at the center of infant galaxies?

[FINNIUSORION]

It's obvious even to children that the entirety of the universe condensed into a singularity doesn't make sense.
Put some dye in a syringe and put the syringe in a vessel of water. Inject just a drop and watch the dye spread out in all directions from a central point. Does that mean the dye was compressed in a singularity at that central point? I think something like bubble universe theory makes more sense. Different bubble universes floating around, colliding and exchanging matter and energy.

[KenJoseph-sp]

But the lucky one found the space where TIME AND SPACE HAD NO MEANING, WHERE THEY CAN LEARN EVERYTHING THAT IS WAS OR EVER CAN BE ALL WITHOUT TIME

[Titus-as-the-Roman]

I think we may all agree that we're not going to learn Diddly-Squat about our Universe until we understand Gravity.

[bryanrmcnair]

If there is NOTHING then nothing will come from it....CREATOR is the only thing that makes sense!

[njjeff]

Fascinating to say the least !!! Awesome graphics!! No wonder one of my favorite places to be is the outdoors & the planetarium.

[marcoblanco]

Just can't imagine the finest thinker exists in the world believed in BIG BANG😏

[midasmusicco.]

It wasn’t a big bang, it was a kid starting a game on his/her computer.

[janverhave]

When AI starts talking and random pictures appear..

[tonywadkins]

I like the title of your YouTube channel. Is that descriptive of what's between your ears?

[WILLIAMMALO-kvgz]

If absolute nothingness could ever exist, it would not be there to cause anything to exist. If absolutely nowhere could ever exist then it could be nowhere to be found and thus could not exist.

[ronaldkemp]

If stars and galaxies appeared so early at the edge of the observable universe then wouldn't this have been in direct relation to the Milky Way's age mass and brightness too, seeing it's 13.7 billion years old? Are they implying that the Milky Way formed rapidly too, meaning it's not really 13.7 billion years old but is younger than the distant galaxies because it's smaller and not as bright? Seeing how they're claiming the evolutionary model might be wrong, then it would also imply it's wrong determining the age of our own galaxy if it too formed rapidly but is much smaller? but this then would indicate the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, big bang, cosmic inflation and more are wrong too. how can a single event create all the galaxies in the universe at the same moment in time having old, massive galaxies at the edge of the observable universe while our galaxy is smaller? If galaxies formed rapidly in the early universe then what prevented our galaxy from forming rapidly too after the big bang?

[thekingofmojacar]

To say that it started with a singularity and a big bang is the same fairy tale as Adam and Eve in paradise...

[thahbiaasad]

What exists between anti-matter and matter if anti-matter particles and matter particles annihilate each other when they meet there has to be something gluing it all together

[useuseuse]

GUYS I'M JUST SAYING THEY NEED TO GROW UP YOU ARE STAYING HERE BUT YOU ARE TOGETHER SO UP TO YOU MY WAY OUT THE NEXT STEP A SUPREME BEING THAT CAN REVERSE AGE 😮😢 ?

[elij]

I wonder if any humans were involved in the creation of this video

[JerseyLynne]

Electric universe theory. Channel is Thunderbolts Project.