Have you been fooled by forensics on TV? | BBC Ideas

preview_player
Показать описание

---------------------

Do you have a curious mind? You’re in the right place.

Our aim on BBC Ideas is to feed your curiosity, to open your mind to new perspectives, and to leave you that little bit smarter.



#CSI #forensics #forensicscience
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

2:22 "The bite marks match those of the monkey found at the scene." 😀😁😆🤣

tomlever
Автор

Thank you for stopping me from remaining a fool at forensics

mohammedsaquibkhan
Автор

The part about fingerprints really worries me...

ErikaLucchi
Автор

Interesting. However... I don't watch much of the CSI-type shows. I did watch Bones and Dexter (both of which do focus on forensics) but I always question those. Bones, I've found, was very accurate. Still don't quite understand blood spatter (from Dexter). But I do watch shows like FBI Files, New Detectives and Forensic Files, all of which only use real cases and the real methods used to solve crimes. In those, bite marks can sometimes (provided the biter has a distinctive enough bite) be used to prove a case. Of course, the most famous was the Ted Bundy case. Having some experience with computers, thank you for pointing out that computers can enhance photos to the degree they always seem to in fiction. That always irritated me. I would often think, "where are these computers? I want that kind of enhancement for my work!" LOL! And as for the time lines-- oh, yes! Only in the FBI Files do they show how long it can take to process and work out a case... sometimes years! Every other show, including Forensic Files skips out the weeks and months it can take to get results-- simply because that bit of analysis is sitting in line, waiting for all the cases before it.

marigeobrien
Автор

great video armen balian news updae there is 30 hundred coundrdcountry up canada

ArmenBalian-wg
visit shbcf.ru