Creating Flexible User Roles with ASP.NET Identity: Inheritance vs Interfaces

Discover whether to use inheritance or interfaces for ASP.NET Identity user roles to enhance code clarity and functionality.
---

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Creating Flexible User Roles with ASP.NET Identity: Inheritance vs Interfaces

In the world of software development, especially when dealing with user management, the way you structure your classes can greatly impact your code's clarity, maintainability, and functionality. This guide addresses a common dilemma faced by developers: "Should I create inheritance users from a base ASP.NET Identity user or implement different interfaces for each role?"

The Problem

Imagine you have two types of users in your application: Buyers and Sellers. Although they share similar properties, each user type is capable of performing specific operations relevant to their role. You wonder whether to consolidate these user types into a single class that implements distinct interfaces or to create separate classes for each role. Specifically, should you design a class User that implements IBuyer and ISeller, or should you opt for two distinct classes?

Exploring the Solution

Using Inheritance

Creating separate classes for each user type often leads to clearer, more manageable code. Here’s a suggested structure:

Base Class: User

Shared properties, like Name, Email, etc.

Implementation of a common interface such as IUser which includes shared methods.

Derived Classes:

Buyer class that inherits from User and implements IBuyer interface.

Seller class that inherits from User and implements ISeller interface.

This structure can provide several advantages:

Clarity: It's clear which properties and methods belong to each role, reducing the ambiguity around the functionality of each user type.

Encapsulation: Each class can encapsulate its own functionality, keeping the code organized and making it easier to implement role-specific features.

Extensibility: Adding new user roles or modifying existing ones is easier as the base functionality is already established in the User class.

Using Interfaces

It is possible to stick to a single user class that implements different interfaces, but consider the trade-offs:

Simplicity: If your user types have significantly different functionalities, great care must be taken to avoid introducing complexity into a single class.

Shared Logic: You may have shared attributes, but the behaviors tied to each role could lead to a verbose and harder-to-read class structure.

Conclusion

While you can implement a single class for the Users using multiple interfaces, creating distinct classes for Buyers and Sellers, with a common base class that handles shared properties, tends to be a more organized and clear solution. This approach not only maintains readability but also provides a more logical structure that separates role-specific functionalities.

In this scenario, prioritize clarity and maintainability—it’s a good practice to keep your code structured and easier to understand as your application grows.

By taking these considerations into account, you’ll be better equipped to make choices that enhance the effectiveness of your application's user management system.