Identify type of grammar (Chomsky: type 0, type 1, type 2, type 3) in theory of computation

Types of grammar in theory of computation is explained in this video. We will discuss about the chomsky hierarchy and see how to check if the given grammar is of type 0 or type 1 or type 2 or type 3 grammar. Check if grammar is regular or CFL or CSL or RE. In this video of CSE concepts with Parinita Hajra, we'll see the examples of given CFG and how to easily and quickly identify the Chomsky normal form type of grammar as type 0, type 1, type 2 or type 3 in theory of computation #cfg #grammartype #toc #chomskynormalform #cse #cseconceptwithparinita

For the people asking me for the equipments I use.... you can buy them from the below links:

If you like my video contents, please LIKE, COMMENT, SUBSCRIBE and SHARE with your friends.
You can always connect with me at:

Compiler design tutorials:

Theory of computation (TOC) tutorials:

Cryptography techniques tutorials:

Artificial Intelligence tutorials:

GATE previous year important questions:

Data Compression tutorials:

Computer networks tutorials:

Technical job updates:

Data structures and Algorithms tutorials:

Programming questions:

Digital image processing:

Digital electronics:

Motivational videos:

Keep learning, keep supporting 🤝✨💯

[c.d.premkumar]

EXCELLENT. I've never seen any video so far that explains identification of types of grammar so very clearly along with examples.

[floki]

Finally someone without using fancy words to confuse people
Good video👍

[wickedotaku]

You're the best, the explanation couldn't be any better, got every single points you taught in this video easily , tysm Mam

[sunnytiwari]

Thank you very very...
Concept is totally clear..

[SanjaySingh-udju]

This is one of the best explanations that I came across 👌👌👌👌

[manaswarke]

Excellent!! I totally understood this concept as well! As it's in my exam day after tomorrow

[joshuasunday]

Best explanation on this concept so far!!

Thank you

[saraswatibalotiya]

Tysm ma'am .I understood every concept cleary by seeing your video

[ongolupushparani]

explanation is very clearly thank u so much mam

[harshshukla]

Thanku so much mam, for clearing most of my doubts 😊

[francescodefulgentiis]

this was exactly what i was looking for, tysm

[shaileshkumarsingh]

i have one doubt, clearly as you have mentioned, for the first example that we need to check the first variable that it is a terminal or nonterminal, and in the given example the first equation S ---> AcaB, this one does not seems to be type 1, other below equations are right and matches the condition to be in type 1, but i am not sure about the first equation, because here that S is a variable, and it is giving a sequence of terminals and non terminals (AcaB) so it wont fall under type 1, please clarify my doubt

[sayantaniguha]

10:58 - Can u explain that with an example ?
You didn't mention anything like that in the aforesaid rules ..

[sweetygangane]

For checking we have to check from type 3 because type 3 automatically type 0, 1, 2

[alex-dnto]

i will now get an A on my test... fine :)

[radicalgames]

Must type 3 grammars have only one terminal or one terminal and one variable? Or can they have for example two terminals and one variable? Like S -> aaB

[.]

mam, tell me one thing
that in Type 3: You said that V->VT*|T* or V->T*V|T*
means
right side can produce list of terminals at right side of the grammer, then why you said the X->abc is not Type 3 at 9:21, why you declare that X->abc is not type 3???

[pujadebnath]

Duniya ghum k ayee samajh mein nahi ayee.. apki video 1 hi dekh k aa gayee..

[nitnelavspetorials]

I have these rules:

X -> xXY | xyz
yY -> yyz
zY -> Yz


Explain me why is this of type 0 pleaseee