Understanding ConcurrentModificationException in Synchronized Java Code: Causes and Solutions

Explore the intricacies of `ConcurrentModificationException` in Java, particularly in synchronized code blocks. Discover why this exception occurs even when proper synchronization is applied, and learn a foolproof solution to prevent it.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: ConcurrentModificationException on synchronized() code - how is it possible?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding ConcurrentModificationException in Synchronized Java Code: Causes and Solutions

In the realm of Java programming, developers often encounter the elusive ConcurrentModificationException. This exception typically emerges when an object is concurrently modified while being iterated over. One of the more perplexing situations arises when developers use the synchronized() blocks, believing that such constructs will shield them from this kind of error. Today, we dive into a specific case involving Java's WebSocket handling that reveals surprising subtleties about concurrency and synchronization.

The Problem

Imagine you are managing WebSocket sessions in a Java Spring application. You've wrapped all your operations on a collection of WebSocket sessions in synchronized blocks, convinced that you've taken all necessary precautions. But occasionally, you still face a ConcurrentModificationException. How is this possible?

Key Code Snippet

Consider the following critical method in your implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Despite appearing to be well-protected, this method can throw ConcurrentModificationException during the iteration phase. Let's unpack why this occurs.

Understanding the Cause

Re-entrant Synchronization

The core issue lies within the nature of synchronized blocks in Java, which are re-entrant. This means a thread that has acquired a lock on an object can invoke other synchronized methods on the same object. In practice, this can lead to unexpected behavior, especially if there's a callback or event listener that attempts to modify the same collection while you are iterating over it.

In your case, the connection closure might only be detected right when you're sending a message through the session, which can unintentionally trigger another synchronized block and modify the collection of sockets while it's already being iterated.

Real-World Analogy

Think of it as being in a meeting where a person holds the floor (is processing a synchronized block). If someone else chimes in (a callback modifying the collection), it leads to confusion because simultaneous discussions (modifications) can disrupt the order of things.

The Solution

To combat the potential pitfalls of concurrent modification, a robust practice is to avoid directly iterating over the collection. Instead, create a copy of the collection for iteration:

Updated Code Snippet

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why This Works

Taking a copy of the sockets ensures that regardless of any alterations made to the original collection during the iteration process, the copy remains unchanged. Thus, you can safely iterate over the copy without risking a ConcurrentModificationException.

Conclusion

While synchronized() blocks might seem to promise safety against concurrent modifications, they don't fully shield you from surprising edge cases like the ConcurrentModificationException. Understanding the nuances of thread safety in Java is crucial for building robust applications. By adopting the practice of iterating over copies of collections, you can navigate the complexities of concurrency and ensure smooth execution in your Java applications.

For developers working with concurrent data structures, it’s vital to remain vigilant and apply best practices to safeguard against unexpected errors. By taking the additional step of copying collections before iteration, you create a safer and more reliable environment for your code to execute. Happy coding!