Causation | LSAT Logical Reasoning

preview_player
Показать описание
LSAT authors frequently present a Curious Fact and then pose/assume some Causal Explanation for that idea, leading us to ponder the plausibility of that explanation and the possibility of other explanations.

LSAT Lab is your digital tutor for the LSAT.

Take a free practice digital LSAT and let us show you the power of personalized learning.

LSAT Lab is the most efficient and effective way to study for the Law School Admission Test. Learn the basics with our free video lessons, and dive deeper with our custom-built tools designed to efficiently improve your score.

With the free LSAT Lab Starter plan you can take a practice test and create a personalized study plan that fits your schedule based on your target LSAT test date, your goal score, and your personal strengths and weaknesses.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to make sure you get our newest LSAT videos.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

First thank you so much for the lesson, it's amazingly helpful!! I have one question, since we talked about when x correlates y, we cannot say x causes y (because there might be other ways to explain), why for the last question around 21:30, when in the question it says these factors TEND TO isolate local politician from their electorates, we just treat is as a causal relationship. i though TEND TO is a keyword indicating a correlation as explained in the earlier part. THANK YOU!

teresasu
Автор

I'm shocked this video doesn't have more views/likes.

brandonkris
Автор

I have a question on 25:44 .. you claimed that we cannot choose answer E because of reverse causality. But, I thought that was a way of explaining a argument??? I thought that Y could cause X and it was only LEGIT in Causal Logic? In addition, the 3rd factor is another way to explain? Or did I confuse myself? Are you saying a way to see what is wrong with the argument is to think to ourselves multiple other ways it could be wrong? Like the College and Vocabulary example.. We could argue that wealthy people are the real reasons why their children are able to obtain advanced vocabulary and not just X leads to Y???

nezsa
Автор

The pie charts on your videos pertaining to question type frequency… Do those percentages reflect the LSAT flex accurately?

jfkgotnoscoped
Автор

If ANC A read " If politicians were less isolated from their electorate then there is a chance that any particular acts of resident participation will elicit a positive response" ; then would it be an ANC supported by the given facts?

haritharaghupathi
Автор

How long till reading comprehension videos? that's the only section I'm struggling on :/

TheOMGFlavio