Justice Clarence Thomas’s finances are in the spotlight — again.

preview_player
Показать описание
A conservative judicial activist paid the Supreme Court justice’s wife thousands for consulting work but deliberately left her name off the paperwork, Post reporting found.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

What a enormous hypocrite.
He complained about
welfare queens & social handouts, while he & family received vacations, homes, college tuitions for decades from billionaire donor. Handouts, bribes or just gifts; y'all decide ~

czroberts
Автор

As a huge fan of blatant corruption, this a big win for me and my constituency.

mugstanmuggy
Автор

Sometimes something isn't "officially against the rules" because it's okay to do, but rather because it's so incredibly against all good sense that the people making the rules never thought they'd have to spell it out.

jimstoesz
Автор

Its only a crime when the POORS do it!

nwatson
Автор

Expand SCOTUS to 13, and put HONOR back in 'Your Honor'

jodirook
Автор

All of a sudden, conservatives are REAL SILENT about "activist judges!"

kjdunne
Автор

We are the new peasant class. Our elected officials and our judges act with impunity and they face no consequences for their actions.

kaseywahl
Автор

Wait, how are judges be punished if they are the one giving out the verdict? Especially a Supreme Court judge? Calling them Justice is really ironic

Leonlion
Автор

The not so Supreme Court. Thomas should be impeached

TheSuperAtheist
Автор

The constitution says that justices can only serve under good behavior; how tf is what Clarence doing considered that? Impeach him.

T_Raffety
Автор

ALL positions in the government should and need to have reasonable term limits including the suprem court. No one should have power for too long.

switchsinc
Автор

WE the people are private citizens, not the Supreme Court, not the Senators, not Congress, all government officials are PUBLIC SERVANTS.

Imagine if you will, an employee working for you, decides to give himself a personal pay raise because he's in real tight with the financial department.
Would you accept this type of action?
No. His ass would be fired and black listed so fast even SNL couldn't write a skit about it being funny.

Reaper
Автор

Confidence isn’t low in the Supreme Court, confidence is zero.

GraceCreatesLivingSpace
Автор

Lack of confidence is an understatement

mattbidart
Автор

The Supreme Court doesn't have to worry about public opinion. They're practically immortal.

deskslam
Автор

The idea that a politician could be in power most of their lives and not be corrupted is ridiculous. Point a glaring light at any politicians serving over a decade and you'll find questionable funds.

Frank_Starkly
Автор

People do jail time for less. Lock up Clarence Thomas

wildbill
Автор

Ban giving any gifts over 50$ to any judge and if one is given/accepted both giver and judge go to prison.

riku
Автор

can we look at all congress like this and stop all corruption? we need to take congress right to hold stocks while in office, term limits, and make accepting lobbist money

alexanderdooley
Автор

Not long ago here in Australia, a state leader lost his job for accepting a 3k bottle of wine he didn't declare.

Dparrey
join shbcf.ru