One what are the bad rules in cafeterias #movie#shorts #video

[lukeporter]

Is this Larry David's dream? Being fully vindicated in one of his quarrels and instantly receiving an apology

[lazo]

I respect that Larry refused the round of drinks

[ecamp]

And then the lawyer charged Larry ten times what the additional buffet would have cost...

[dillzilla]

This has actually come up in court before and it was the customer that lost. The phrase "all you can eat" has a noun limitation on it being "you". Anyone who isnt "you" using the services provided becomes a breach of contract according to the pre-disclosed terms.

[drampabay]

“Can you prove prior intent?”
Well he brought his attorney…

[adamrbeaver]

The implied contract included the words “all-you-can-eat” not all you and everyone else at your table can eat.

[EpochUnlocked]

"All you can eat" is pretty clear to me. One person.

[angrytedtalks]

The attorney is wrong. The contract between _each_ diner implies all you can eat (at one sitting, not forever) per person.
If the other diners participate in the buffet, they too are liable to pay for the buffet food. The deal is what you _eat_ not what you _share_ with others.

[jayhome]

The restaurant has the right to refuse service to customers, particularly if they believe someone is violating health, safety, or operational policies, even if those rules weren't clearly stated beforehand. They can refuse him service as long as the reason is not discriminatory. The B.S. the lawyer said isn't true. Besides most buffets state that the price for the buffet is per person. That is in and of itself an implication that the buffet is intended for the person paying.

[oldpeopleplayinggames]

Hiriam Katz, Attorney at Law, should have handled Larry's divorce. All he got is Sweden

[krisrap]

According to Ugo Lord, "All you can eat" means all that the paying diner can EAT himself - not share with others. There doesn't have to be any more fine print. That makes Larry Davis responsible for the damages that happen next!

[brianphillips]

Theft is theft. Lawyers confuse the truth.

[michaelpowers]

I told my neighbor he could hunt on my place. He kept bringin more people until at one point he had a group of seven people walking through my yard. That's when I built that high fence.

[drudle]

Typically, any buffet worth anything would have a policy against plate sharing. And since the product had not yet been purchased, as the meal is paid for at the end, they are able to establish what you can do with it. No monetary transaction had been made yet.

[_-]

Lawyer is wrong, implied contract is 'All YOU can EAT'. It states only the one buying the buffet can eat the food.

[kwickwash]

proves that lawyers are horrible people

[Weaselbroom]

Refuse service, refund money, ask them to leave, and ban all of them from ever returning. I hate A holes.

[DDIoop]

Restaurant can simply deny service at any point.

[ivermektin]

"Why did 106 countries kick us out?"

[chronixdubz]

This actually happened at a red lobster almost exactly like that conversation and the customers were told to pay up for it cause it was that persons purchase of the buffet not their purchase of the buffet to hand out to then potentially ask for more when those prices are what they are because of the buffet vs regular pricing