Nuclear 4.0 | The Small Modular Reactor Revolution

preview_player
Показать описание
Is this the Future Of Nuclear? Can Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) pave the way for nuclear energy's mainstream entry?

I want to explore whether these systems will fall into the same traps as conventional nuclear power, or finally offer the trinity of inexpensive, reliable and intrinsically safe energy.

#nuclear #physics #breakthrough #future #technology

Merch!
I think Scientists are Rockstars so I made t-shirts to celebrate it

If you enjoy the channel and want even more physics, tech, and business content, I've just launched new Instagram and Threads pages. Follow on the links below

A few people have asked so I've added the info below. Some of these are affiliate links. If you make a purchase it doesn't cost you anything extra, but a percentage of the sale will help support this channel and my work to bringing entrepreneurship into science.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

4:15 Supercriticality just means "reaction rate goes up", which is quite important when starting up a reactor. Increasing heat output is key for going from 'warm rock' to 'useful power plant'. It's just _uncontrolled_ supercriticality which is bad.

TheAceOverKings
Автор

3-mile island failure was not dmging, just widely broadcasted by media and blown out of proportion. You can actually look up a list of failures and only 2 out of over 100 were dmging, there are over 400 total plants in operation as over 2023, but there have also been at least 100 that have been shut down in the 10yrs earlier. Every modern navy ship is nuclear powered, not one failure on those since their start of use.

jandraelune
Автор

Would've been nice to mention, that nuclear, with all its accidents, still kills the fewest people per energy output.

Windows__
Автор

The Moltex Static Salt design does away with almost every hazard from traditional nuclear power. Its sheer simplicity and intrinsic safety should dramatically reduce costs. It’s also scaleable by building more reactors on the same site. It is naturally load following and and cannot over heat. Excessive temperature stops the nuclear reaction long before it becomes dangerous. It could be disconnected from load at full power and nothing nasty would happen. It has boron shut-down rods but they are not needed as an emergency tool.
There is no water or steam in the core so no pressure and considerably less corrosion than we get in PWR cores.
We should be moving heaven and earth to build these things. Instead we have an out of control nuclear regulator that completely stalled progress. Moltex is now getting the job done in Canada.

davidelliott
Автор

Reactors in the 250-500MW range would be useful. I worked as a consultant for a Canadian power utility, who could have replaced their entire generation fleet with a couple of big reactors. It was not practical to do so because a typical large reactor is down for maintenance about 12 days a year. Taking a small modular reactor offline can be much more easily scheduled, if you have a fleet of them.

donaldjmccann
Автор

10/10 for excitement 5/10 for technical knowledge, 2/10 for commercial application, 0/10 for future use of micro nuclear plants. We have major switchgear yards adjacent to previous nuclear plants. These are the ideal sites for re-siting without significant GRID restructuring. It is the GRID STRUCTURE that determines the future generation sites not the generator.

philipbaker
Автор

4:05 Super critical doesn't automatically mean bomb or else it would be impossible to get the reactor to produce more than decay heat. The whole runaway melting/boom thing has to do with prompt criticality and a bunch of fun physics.

EliteCuttlefish
Автор

I got 70% through this and still no mention of the Thorium Molten Salt Reactor (which we had working just fine over 50 years ago). Why is that?

toddmarshall
Автор

the fact that Yellow Cake is not just less expensive than Printer Ink, but it's a low single-digit percentage, seems to be bordering on something profound... 🤣

lady_draguliana
Автор

Nuclear power brings down electricity prices by 75% in Finland.

buildmotosykletist
Автор

@20:50 The lunar night is between 1.5 and 3.5 days? I don't think so. More like 14 to 15 days.

ShawnHCorey
Автор

Galen Winsor said for years nuclear power was safe. He drank the water and swam in the cooling ponds. Died at an old age.

jamesflake
Автор

20:18 "...in the northern hemisphere and so receive less sunlight."
I'll remind you that the northern hemisphere starts at the equator, and covers one-half of the Earth.
Cheers.

JxH
Автор

Dr. Miles ignored the single biggest use case for mobile SMRs in the 50-80 MW range: commercial shipping.

willythemailboy
Автор

Flammanville III in France was supposed to be online in 2012. So far it has not even had the fuel rods loaded. It was 5x over budget years ago.

gordonlawrence
Автор

The main weakness of SMRs is competition. For their business model to work, they need economies of scale. One company needs to produce hundreds of copies of their SMR. If there are too many companies competing, each individual model can not be produced cheaply enough to be worth it.

DunnickFayuro
Автор

I had this discussion with some friends who live in a small town a few hours away from me. They were very enthusiastic about a small scale nuclear reactor that could be dropped off in their town, solving their energy problems forever. I asked them to have a look at their current lot of local councillors and council staff and choose somebody they could could trust to run the little plant, keep it safe for generations, and dispose of the waste. Nobody could put forward a name they would trust, which suggests to me that safety of these things depends on more than just good engineering.

gfbprojects
Автор

Dr Ben: Please address Thorium Nuclear as an option for SMRs.

stevemorrell
Автор

The 3+gen European EPR reactor is producing 1600MW so the SMR mention in this video need 21 reactors to produce the same amount of power. EPR is buildt at 8-9M$ for each Megawatt, but the failed Nuscale/Utah project clocks in at 20M$/Mwat. Nuclear is ridiculously expensive both at small or large scale. Even before waste handeling is considered.

EnuffSaid
Автор

Another market for micro-reactors, is for self-consumption industrial use (e.g., manufacturing and tech). Tech companies are little more open to risk taking, exploring new technologies, esp. if they are low carbon. They. also have deep pockets and can take the early adopter premium. The growth of data centers, increasing energy use from AI, presents another use case, guaranteed uptake, to jumpstart a new industry.

mintakan