Understanding Setters in C# with Mutable Objects: How to Maintain Invariants

Explore effective strategies for using setters with mutable objects in C# to enforce business logic and maintain invariants in your classes.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How are setters used with mutable objects?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Setters in C# with Mutable Objects: How to Maintain Invariants

In the world of programming, ensuring that our classes enforce certain rules is crucial, especially when dealing with mutable objects — those that can be modified after they are created. A common challenge in C# arises when working with setters, which are typically designed to enforce business logic, while simultaneously dealing with mutable objects that can break those rules. Let’s explore this issue further and discuss effective solutions.

The Problem: Setters and Mutable Objects

Consider the scenario depicted in the following classes, Car and SchoolDriver:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, a SchoolDriver is not permitted to have a car with a maximum speed greater than 200 MPH. Although the setter function enforces this rule when assigning a new car, it does not prevent direct modifications to an existing car's attributes — allowing the SchoolDriver to upgrade the engine and potentially violate this invariant.

This raises the concern: How can we enforce restrictions on mutable objects while using setters effectively?

Solution: Embracing Immutability

One solution to this problem is to design your mutable classes to be immutable. Here’s how you can refactor the Car class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why Immutability?

Predictability: The state of an immutable object cannot change after it has been constructed. This characteristic simplifies reasoning about the application's behavior.

Safety: It helps maintain invariants since values no longer may be tampered with once set.

Performance: With immutable objects, you can safely share instances across threads without risking modification.

Handling Mutable Objects Securely

If it’s unavoidable to use mutable objects, it’s best to restrict their exposure to prevent unintended modifications. Here’s how the SchoolDriver can be structured to manage this effectively:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Common Pitfalls: Read-Only Properties

It's essential to recognize that readability does not mean safety. For instance, consider the following representation of a PersonList class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, while Names appears to be read-only, the underlying list can still be modified, allowing unwanted entries. Instead, use read-only wrappers:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

While employing setters with mutable objects in C# can seem challenging, the key lies in understanding how to manage state effectively. By opting for immutability when possible and securely handling mutable objects when necessary, you can preserve invariant conditions in your applications.

With these strategies, you can ensure that your classes maintain their integrity while still providing the flexibility required for code evolution. Happy coding!