Supreme Court Takes S&W v Mexico Case

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear another gun case - this one brought by the country of Mexico. Why has Mexico sued Smith & Wesson? What is the PLCAA and could this case change a long standing pro-gun law? The Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes talk about what’s going on with this bizarre case and what they think the Supreme Court will do.

Support Our 2A Community:

Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys

#2A

#ArmedAttorneys

#SelfDefense

General Information Only

The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney.

All Rights Reserved

This material was produced in the United States of America and is the sole property of Armed Attorneys, LLC. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

[DavidSmith_WDPS]

This "foreign" lawsuit sure has a lot of involvement from US anti-gun groups.

[MrDan]

Could the anti gun groups be counter sued for the legal costs incurred in defending against these frivolous lawsuits?

[ds]

How about suing Mexico for allowing fentanyl to pour in.

[daleshaw]

There's no way that S&W is selling firearms in Mexico and that they are all being transported to Mexico illegally. These lawsuits need to be stopped.

[garyag]

Can Mexico be sued for the drugs coming into America? 👍🙏🤩🇺🇸

[timriley]

They should be sueing the ATF and Obama.

[jaynecobb]

We should play the game too and sue the hell out of the gun grabbers.

[MAG-lijo]

I pray that Smith & Wesson does not do what Remington did.

[scottkendrix]

USSC should throw this lawfare case out.

[TheMisgnomer]

and Remington never should have paid out either

[theOriginal_ex]

Didn't there used to be a thing about counter-suit to recover legal fees and such for frivolous suits like this?

[uzifelner]

Another waste of our money & time.

[kevinwhite]

Why would our supreme court listen to a law suit from out side of its jurisdiction? Aka Mexico has no way to enforce there laws in the U.S.A. nor does the U.S.A in Mexico. Waist of monet out of taxes payers pockets.

[jackieow]

What gives Mexico standing to file a case in any U.S. court?

[genericdude]

Some lower courts are ignoring Bruen so it doesn't matter if SCOTUS decides in favor of other pro-2A. SCOTUS needs to find a way to force these lower courts to follow their decision. The courts should have thrown out this S&W case based on PLCAA.

[jakboxehtin]

Why not sue automobile manufacturers for trucks and Jeep type vehicles because they are too attractive for Cartel using them in executing their criminal activities

[stephenarmstrong]

Love ❤️ you guys. Richard is so laid back, and Emily is so intense. Makes for a well-balanced program .

[stevea]

Emily…You are a true attourney…getting so excited by well worded briefs & supreme court live augments 👍🏻😝🤩

[joejohnson]

Rather than have just the PLCAA there needs to be a law passed by Congress that no manufacturer, dealer or seller can be held liable for the misuse or criminal use of their product . If an act like this would be introduced it would have the backing and support from literally every manufacturer and company and would also increase the amount of money for lobbyists' to push this in Congress . I can't see any manufacturer or company be against this because they would know if one was effected than all could be effected .

[FlameBlue]

Kinda strange eh maybe Mexico can sue the Mexican drug and gun runners as well…