Netflix's IC814 Series Controversy: Hindu Code Names Spark Outrage | NewsTrack | Rahul Kanwal

preview_player
Показать описание
India Today’s Rahul Kanwal discusses the IC814 hijacking with key figures including Anil Sharma, Kanchan Gupta, and Hindol Sen Gupta. The discussion covers the outrage over the use of Hindu code names by hijackers, the government's response failures, and the complexities of the incident. The programme also features perspectives from those involved during the crisis, including former RAW chief AS Dullat. The discussion aims to provide a comprehensive view of the events and the government's handling of the situation.

#netflix #ic814 #hijacking #rahulkanwal #indiatoday #governmentfailures #hinducodenames

Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a new video.

All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button!

India Today TV is India's leading English News Channel. India Today YouTube channel offers latest news videos on Politics, Business, Cricket, Bollywood, Lifestyle, Auto, Technology, Travel, Entertainment and a lot more.

Stay tuned for latest updates and in-depth analysis of news from India and around the world!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This lady is so unaware of realities and didnt see that Anubhav Sinha disrespected his own country

shails
Автор

Well said Mr Sengupta. You have struck down the attempt of India Today anchor to defend Anubhav Sinha.

navienmarwah
Автор

The most idiotic debate I have seen.

1. That lady should not have been invited. She clearly is a Hindu phobe. Did I hear her say there is Hindu Terror and that is a possibility?
2. The first priority in a hijack is to bring the hostages safely. The standard idea that you do not give into terrorist demands is stupid. It is what you do post is what matters. If you build a reputation of hunting them down, you will find that to be as effective.
3. Rahul Kanwal thinks they should have stormed the plane. That is the most stupid idea unless you know exactly where the terrorists are located and have a way to hit them before there is too many casualities. The question is how many is too many? One is too many. So storming the plane is a bad idea.

Have some sense fellas. This is not a series worth watching. I am certainly not going to.

MrRk
Автор

I don't understand why she has to mention that she is a Hindu and a Brahmin ?? Was that a question ??

idioticstuff
Автор

Rahul Kanwal are you serious, It was ISI plan. you have no ideaa and am shocked at your knowledge

shails
Автор

ANubhab and Netflix are making money at the cost of security and integrity of India

shails
Автор

This Bhardawaj lady wannabe actor has only one point - I’m Brahamin and I don’t have a problem with Hindu name without understanding the context😅

Indus
Автор

Hindol Sengupta is right. Rahul Kanwal could be called one of the mischief maker.

ramjosyula
Автор

Rahul why don’t you interview Anubhav & grill him the way you tried Dulat & Kanchan Gupta! I know you don’t have the guts. Sur Tan Se Juda Hoga

Ranjit
Автор

Why this film producers given Hindu names to hijackers instead of Muslim names they could have given real names of the hijackers who are all Pakistanis

sriranga
Автор

Series based on past events should be evaluated primarily on factual grounds rather than through the lens of contemporary perspectives, which are often influenced by hyper-nationalism. This black-and-white approach hinders our understanding of complex realities.

The series' portrayal of terrorists using code names like 'Doctor, ' 'Bhola, ' 'Burger, ' and 'Shankar' aligns with documented facts, reportedly listed on a government website, possibly the Ministry of External Affairs.

While I found the series to be decent, it didn't reach the quality of 'Patal Lok' or 'Family Man.' The hype surrounding it was excessive.

Veer Sanghvi's article in The Print highlights several instances where the series failed to accurately depict the involvement of the ISI.

Given these factors, it's essential to understand the filmmakers' research methods and how Anubhav chose to portray the real-life experiences of the hostages. While creative liberties are acceptable, it's crucial to avoid distorting facts. The disappointment expressed by Mr. Sharma, chief steward, suggests that the series may have been rushed and lacked sufficient research

sameerchaturvedi
Автор

After watching the series my observations: 1) Nick names correctly shown ( confirmed by passengers and Mr Sharma the Crew head of that flight) but real names not shown at the end credits, , that is hiding the facts they were all Pakistani Muslims 2) downplaying the nightmare faced by the hostages Imagine the horror they faced 3) ISI involvement downplayed 4) Confusing part real names are shown that of Captain and Afgani Ext affairs minister Mr Muttawakil but Indian Ext affairs minister name changed? why? also CO pilot changed from a Sikh to Hindus? why?

jiti
Автор

First of all it is wrong to say right vs left. It’s a web series based on true story and how can you make it drama! Better you name it something else, there won’t be any backlash

Canada_Kasthuri
Автор

Pathetic & Shameful replies by Former Raw Chief -- Much could have been done in Amritsar -- Govt. and Agency failed ..

BoltaMann
Автор

Rahul.. what's wrong with you? You are unnecessarily asking Raw Chief repeatedly same questions!!!

muktaashok
Автор

Very Unprofessional to even attend and share more information on the case !!!

siddusaik
Автор

Question is Why the director did not disclose at the end that the 5 were Muslims, , , no body saying that the code names shown are false

jiti
Автор

Creative license cant be misused specially such an horrible situation

jiti
Автор

Rahul. U r asking wrong questions today

muktaashok
Автор

And who is this lady actress? Why is she talking on behalf of who? Talk about the last statement on ISI, what's that about please explain. And if its not fact may air india should sue them for using thier airlines code ic814.

samg