'This Information Will Bend Your Reality! | Terrence Howard

Terrance Howard invites you to question the very foundations of mathematics and how they relate to our understanding of the natural world. It's real, powerful, and transformative. So sit tight and let’s dive in!

"This is Mind-blowing!"

©️ SOURCE CREDIT

#terrencehoward #sacredgeometry
=====================================================

► ►Footage licensed through: Videoblocks & Filmpac
►Music from Audiojungle
Copyright disclaimer: We own commercial licenses for all the content used in this video. =====================================================
Our purpose, when making these videos, is to make quality financial educational videos and share these with our viewers.

1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
2)This video is also used for teaching purposes.
3)It is transformative in nature.
4)I ONLY used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.

[Bull_sheet_Bob]

This video makes perfect sense. I don't know why people are getting confused..

[wrc]

I'm so glad that one guy challenged the Dewey Decimal System. Librarians around the world are eternally grateful.

[DeepblueskyDeepbluesky]

I consider the "problem" is linguistic, rather than actually mathematical. One dollar equals one hundred cents. So 1x1=1 is numerical, but if you're saying 1 dollar x 1 dollar = 1 dollar that is a linguistic inadequacy, that needs to be seen as different. If I say 100 cents x 1 = 100 cents, the linguistic inadequacy is resolved. It is the language we use, and how we communicate and understand that language that needs to improve.

[dolam]

I would be impressed if he spoke to a room of mathematicians about his beliefs. I seem to recall that he was invited to speak at Oxford to address actors, not scientists. He is stringing together a bunch of random things to sound intelligent. For instance, what does the Dewey decimal system have to do with math? It is a way to classify books in a library. He throws out random information to sound intelligent, but it is essentially meaningless.

[jorgecintron]

This was incredible. The math stuff is cool but nobody seems to be talking about the 2 bombshells he dropped during his presentation. One is that he knows a guy that has the cure for Cancer & AIDS and the other is that his life may be in danger because of his findings. Let that frequency sink in.

[herbiewalkermusic]

Much of the problem comes down to exactly how we define the word ‘multiply’

[CaribbeanQueenxx]

Terrance Howard 😳😳that I ! 😍🥰🥰. I will watch this 1 more time, that was amazing ..

[rudyponzio]

TY🙏🏻I rarely get sick in the sea. In a way. We're in the sea of humanity. The sickness of sameness's sanity? Once you take a bite you've bitten.

[Kat_Rizzo]

I got hooked Terrance Howard after a video by a Gov't site said he was wrong. As we all have learned from our conspiracy handbooks, if the Gov't says not to look at something/not to question, ..then it needs to be looked at and questioned.

[theoriginalkilox]

The Collatz conjecture
is a famous unsolved math problem that states that any positive integer will always end up in an infinite loop if you start with it. The conjecture asks if repeating two simple arithmetic operations will eventually transform every positive integer into 1

[waywardsonsgamerclan]

We built math from the top down so when it gets small it breaks down that's why the binary gets confusing but at the same time so amazing.

[dannyvanrooi]

When he says we can't travel in a straight line to another planet it makes sense.
Mars would be busy circulating the sun.

So to calculate how we'll land on mars we would move in a curve/bend to get there and predict where mars will be when we leave earth in this and that time.

[c.d.osajotiamaraca]

No the narrator misses the point. Its NOT complicated. Terrence is saying that the CONTEXT of counting is wrong WITHIN MULTIPLICATION. Multiplication IS NOT how many times you count the object to be multiplied. IT IS HOW MANY TIMES THAT OBJECT MULTIPLIES. Such as "this object multiplies itself 1 once." It's very simple, not complex. "This object multiplies itself 0 times." That's his insight. And that corresponds MATERIALY to how nature i.e. the physical world works. In which case, no object multiplied zero times would ever = nil. It's impossible.

The consequence is that you have to utilize all kinds of retrofitting equations to make your formulas work where the concerned units are multiplied. So people who follow the rules are rewarded, and people — who at square one — the math didn't make sense in elementary school are punished.

Another insight is that it's a huge waste of time to make such a formula as 1x1 when all you have to say is "1." There it's done. And "the object x 0 " is a complete waste of intelligence. So either its a conspiracy, useful for financial gain. Or, they just didn't understand what we now know about physical laws. Incredible!

[ObscenelyMarvelous]

His argument sounds like the answers I'd give to essay questions in elementary school when I didn't know the answers. They got marked wrong. Objects are not multiplied by objects; objects are multiplied by quantities. Has he never placed or fulfilled a purchase order? As for the questionable economic stability, isn't that because minted dollars are no longer backed by gold? I agree that certain math is ridiculous, but what is he on?

[shajohn]

Something tells me it makes sense, even though I don't understand it at this point. Will do my own research though. I find it interesting because it challenges what I think I know....Mmm

[TheDentsRUs]

A little bit of truth and a little bit of misinformation creates a mess always

[donnahall-kumar]

Well new information always comes from PERSON, PLACE OR THINGS BY DESIGN...🎉
👀👂👂✨

[אביחיעקיבהדאביס]

One of the biggest challenges with his speech is that there is truth mixed with false information and unless you can differentiate the two you'll resort to one. For example just because he is right about becoming interstellar dosn't make him automatically right about math. No bank multiplies money, they all add it.

He goes on to do this throughout his whole lecture and as covincing as it sounds the average person cant discern between the two because as soon as they hear something that makes sense to them they automatically conclude he is right about the whole thing.

While I think he has very valid points in somethings it is highly skewed in others. I believe i. even more certain when he was combative towards some of the questions. Rather than answer them directly he answered them indirectely presenting random historical facts going on to talk about something else like when he dismissed the math question and went straight to the reason why he pattened his work.

The best way I understand the multiplication factor is from Harry Potter when the cups kept multiplying.

[vanessauevr]

Terrence is spot on. And they know it.

[TheAzureStarton]

Terrence is right.
1x1=1 never made any sense to me.
He is onto something.
Action+Action=Reaction