Judge to hear arguments on Jack Smith after Trump calls for dismissal in documents case

preview_player
Показать описание
Donald Trump's legal team is arguing that special counsel Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in the former president's classified documents case. A judge will hear arguments Friday about whether Smith should be removed. Attorney and CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman has more.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This judge needs to be removed immediately

nicholasrosebush
Автор

Why can't someone stop this bs, it's a circus

tracey
Автор

This wreaks of desperation and corruption. Cannon is the only judge trump hasn’t been disparaged; that in and of itself shows whose side Cannon is on.

carlalatuda
Автор

Really! The constitution must be followed.

Ohioblues
Автор

None of us would get 2 years of delays.

antrygis
Автор

Amazing how much the party of supposed law and order continue to interfere in these cases.

donxavier
Автор

Let's vote to take Cannon out of the case! Trump knows he's going to lose..Definitely guilty.

uyrobzd
Автор

The justice department doesn’t get to dismiss arguments, it violated the law.

sgeine
Автор

"Trump's political operation has spent about $184 million in legal fees since 2016, with the bulk of that spending in the years following the former president's failed reelection bid in 2020."

RedStatesPovertyWatch
Автор

She’s taking allot of heat because she’s incompetent and doesn’t have the experience to be able to manage her court much less to understand what her job is

KevinGreiner-fynr
Автор

The person who should be removed fm this case is the judge Aileen Cannon. Highly unqualified for a case of this magnitude 😢.

waynesivels
Автор

Won't be shocked if she rules in favor of Trump & dismisses the case...she'll get alot of flack for it but she doesn't care...if she doesn't rule in Trump's favor I'll be shocked...she's trying her best to make it all go away for him...

andreaknapp
Автор

Ridiculous hearing. No other judge would even entertain this.

stevemlejnek
Автор

You would think that voters deserved to know if that laptop was real. Doesn't look like that happened. These people truly have Trump Derangement Syndrome.

jbatt
Автор

I think she gonna end up getting removed from the bench for incompetence and potential malfeasance.

LVEMRE
Автор

Whats going to happen next is Cannon will request written arguements be submitted in the next 30 days, after which she will take 6-8 weeks to review and rule on it another 2-4 weeks later. That should bring us to just before election day, at which point she will either entertain another motion based on dream logic or saybit's too close to an election to hear anything else until after the election is done.

There should be a post-grad class on running out the clock, and this should be the main rubric.

V.Perez
Автор

I bet $1000 says within the next decade we find out she took a kickback. She’s on take. Just like the Supreme Court for sale.

JessicaJohnson-mvlb
Автор

You WOULD think voters would need to be informed before voting… and should be.

anitashaver
Автор

Let me idiotsplain this. The DOJ lacks Jurisprudence and Jurisdiction necessary to deny or dismiss legal claims or challenges. That is solely for a judge to determine. So your claim that the DOJ had already denied Trump's petition to remove the illegally appointed special council has no merit or standing and carries no legal implication for Trump. The DOJ denied Trump's challenge to the appointment of the special council. Trump's petition to the court is to have the case dismissed in totality due to the illegal nature of the Special Councils appointment. But by all means, put a spin on the story so that you can continue making fake news. At this point the only thing keeping your ratings up is by mentioning his name. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.

stephencastello
Автор

Cannon is both biased and incompetent and should at least be removed from the case if not disbarred.

WilhelmSallsten