WHICH IS BEST? - Suzuki GSX-8R or Triumph Daytona 660

Suzuki GSX-8R and the Triumph Daytona 660, two of the best value mid range bikes available, but which is best and which would you buy? A comparison between the bikes on the same roads, back to back.

Suzuki GSX-8R Specs

Power: 82.9 PS
Kerb mass: 205 kg
Torque: 78Nm @ 6,800rpm
Engine capacity: 776cc
Engine: 4-stroke, 2-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC
Fuel capacity: 14.0 litres
Seat height: 810 mm
MPG: 67.23

Triumph Daytona 660 Specs

Liquid cooled, inline 3-cylinder,12 valve, DOHC
Capacity 660 cc
Bore 74.04 mm
Max Power EC 70 kW (95PS) at 11,250 rpm
Max Torque EC 69 Nm @ 8,250 rpm
Seat Height 810 mm
Tank Capacity 14 L
Wet Weight 201 kg
Fuel Consumption (4.9 l / 100 km) 57.6 mpg

Photos and memories to:

The All Year Motorcyclist Web Page

#triumphmotorcycles
#triumph660
#triumphdaytona
#suzukigsx8r
#motovlog
#motovlogging

[WyreForestBiker]

Spot on to focus on the engine, a motorcycle is an engine on wheels everything else is secondary especially these days when all bikes are so competent.
So between these 2 it all comes down to triple / twin preference . I always say Triumphs triple is the greatest engine of the past 30 years which I stand by, but the Suzuki 800 engine has been designed for real roads where torque is king and for me I'd edge towards the 8R . Slightly less frantic and more usable and relaxing for an everyday bike with touring in mind .😊

[cp]

Great video comparison of 2 great bikes. For me it’s the Triumph for the sporty handling, rush of higher revs and the characterful triple engine, but there’s also much to love with the Suzuki for a more relaxed low rev high torque ride I don’t think the Suzuki would be a disappointment either.

[simonwalden]

Another great video. So I’ve ridden both of these today, pretty much back to back. I’m much shorter than you at 5’7” and found both bikes fit me well.
Looks wise the Daytona seems better finished from a quality of paint point of view and looks far nicer to my eye.
Handling is good on both bikes, the Daytona has a lovely front end, the Suzuki more planted but both really good.
In terms of engine if you’re a really sporty rider the Daytona is noticeably faster, it has a genuine top end thrust that the Suzuki lacks. However I realise that many people ride more sedately and the torque on the Suzuki is lovely. That’s not to say the Daytona is lacking either, just not as thrusty low down. Fuelling is impeccable on both bikes.
Currently Triumph are offering 2.9% on finance, with some great deals I’ve seen at £7795.00 . At that money it’s hard to say no!
Appreciate the video, great job!

[iantownsend]

Great comparison video mate. Suzuki for me although a younger me might go for the triumph. The reality is I couldn't trust myself on either 😆 🤣 😂. 3...2...1 ignition launch full afterburner 🏍🚀

[tonymann]

An excellent comparison, thanks. I’m torn between these two and the Honda CBR 650. 2, 3 or 4 cylinders, we are spoilt for choice!

[crumblymal]

Nice one TAYM never ridden with a quick shifter so have no idea on how good or otherwise they are but on looks for me the Daytona might just edge it I thought the wind noise was slightly more pronounced on the GSX .I would imagine that for a person of your height would; find the GSX more comfortable being a little longer/larger maybe I was surprised that you found the Daytona slightly more comfortable and all bikes should have self canceling indicators for sure 😉 . Very interesting watch TAYM cheers👌👍

[hobnob]

Afternoon TAYM great comparison although for you I would say you would also have to take into consideration 1. You’ve got a couple of triumphs so a different make is always nice 2. Both your triumphs are twins so a different engine would be good 🤔 as a triumph fan boy that you are 😜 it should come down to how the bike makes you feel and does it have that ‘ look back at it ‘ factor when you’ve parked up🤔 both my Moto Guzzi’s give me both of those which is why they’re probably keepers😉👍🏻 carry on that man Caio for now tat ta 👍🏻

[hermitmonk]

Thank you for a splendid and insightful comparison. I’m a Triumph fan but am not surprised by your conclusion. I had a Trident 660 earlier this year, on paper it seemed a good complement to Buddy’s cousin. I finally had to admit I didn’t like it. Just like you said about the Daytona, it wasn’t grown up, I was a bit embarrassed by it really having been out of short pants now for over 6 decades. Ok it was quick ish but what a palaver it made, not effortless like my old 675 striple, so I never went much quicker than on the Bonnie. What I really want to say was I got the quick shifter on mine, it was only 300 quid. If you get a chance to try one have a go. Mine worked great down but at high revs and hard acceleration it just refused to work. Which I thought was the whole point. I could get smoother and faster up shifts using the old fashioned “clutchless” method. Oh and I did find the handling unpredictable in sharpish bends. I traded it for a Street Twin or Speed 900 or whatever. It’s absolutely Bloody Marvellous. It’s my third but the first one I’ve truly appreciated. Feels so different to the T100. Anyway, I’m sorry I’ve gone on at such length but it’s been a bit of a topic with me this year. Why don’t they just resurrect the 675? It was loads better.

[trevjones]

It's like choosing between Cadburys chocolate and Nestlé chocolate. The best one comes in a nice coloured wrapper. Excellent choice sir 👌

[bally]

Think you made the right choice with the 8r😊. Love your new orange triumph, you certainly had me fooled pulling up at the Kawasaki/Suzuki dealer 😅. Thought you were going to add a garden tour while you were filming there, like 2WW😅.

[Trevster]

Both great bikes so hard choice it will all come down to how they fit and make you feel, I have the 8s and so far just over 4000 smiles and loving the low end torque at legal speeds. love to test the 8r and triumph though. 8r in blue looks fantastic.

[paulwatts]

i think suzuki is definitely the right choice, i just think the suzuki will be more versatile and not just a sport bike. Triumph may be quality but japanese built motorcycles are still the benchmark . That said i am on my 10th bike in the last year 😬and i don, t think there are many bad ones now. You, ll never know which is best till you try them all . (note i have given up trying to ride z900rs like a classic 500, i found the same as you it encourages silliness). New bike next week 👍

[Grumpy-Goblin]

Fantastic comparison TAYM and even though I'm a Triumph fan boy I think the Suzuki would have it for me just because I think it is a more 'real world" bike where torque is more useful than outright power. It pains me to say it I do think the Suzuki is the better looking by a hair but I can also see how that triple could be the thing that sways it the other way for some folks.

[GapBahnDirk]

What a great comparison! Without a doubt, for modern day town and country roads, out of those two bikes, the Classic 350 is the best one 😁😁. If you are considering pulling a trailer though, get the Suzuki 😂😂. I know, but I did enjoy the video 👍👍.

[markpercy]

Great review for both bikes, for looks l would go with the Suzuki but l do love a triple engine 👍

[rodneybarcus]

I would agree with you that the Suzuki wins but not by a lot. The comfort thing for me is important and the price is good.

[RodKrisBisdakMotovlog]

Wow that's absolutely awesome bro

[daintree]

Amazing the roads in the UK bumpy from tree roots...our roads in OZ are wallaby ted😊 like that but its got nothing to do with trees, unfortunately Govt neglect.That Daytona sounds great be hard to keep that beauty below speed limit. Thanks TAYM 😊😊😊

[SOLOMOTOUK]

Good Morning Taym decent comparison I’d prefer the Suzuki 👍🏍️😎

[JH-oxhn]

I always feel a bit suspicious when it comes to "Which is best" videos, as almost everything is a matter of taste.