can YOU pass the bar exam?

[matthewstone]

More of these bar examine question videos please!

[jareda]

This is ChatGPT's response..

The correct answer is C) No, because the sign did not explain the danger and only told her that it was not available, and she therefore did not know what she was encountering. While the sign warned that the elevator was not available, it did not fully explain the danger of using the elevator or the consequences of doing so. Additionally, it is the responsibility of the city to ensure that their facilities are safe for public use, and the warning sign alone does not absolve them of this responsibility. Therefore, the city may be found liable for negligence in this case. Contributory negligence may be a factor, but it is not a complete defense if the city's own negligence contributed to the accident. Strict liability is also not applicable in this case as the city is not engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.

[constitutionalli]

Only thing I love more than you guys is this QUIZ format!! Fun!! Love it

[walterclements_]

if the elevator doors could open for everyone, the sign is the only real barrier stopping someone from falling down the shaft. this is gross negligence

[roman.nurdms]

Yes, I got it right. Time to be an attorney

[AM-gmzx]

Piece of cake, she is drinking wine like it's hard. Looool

[hinatagirl]

Just got out of torts this semester so I was ready for this exact question 😂

[shacktime]

I know the that reasonable steps also have to be taken to prohibit access to such hazards. Signs alone simply aren’t enough.

[gamerguy]

I got that right! That was actually really easy

[Alisacrooks]

Explain why answer choice B is wrong, please.

[Tipperary]

A sign doesnt protect blind ppl. Or non English spking folks. Need physical barrier + int'l falling body (to doom) sign plus braille.

[RDNEWS]

I actually got C 😂😂 but i would never have explained it as easy as that.

[rickgrimes]

I got it right! Now like 399 more to go

[adolfoduarte]

Ah I thought the second choice was the right one. I'd like to know why it wasn't compared to the third option.

[kolverius]

being honest that comon sense because im not a lawyer and never study and I got it rigth tho or im genuis? nah i dont think so.

[Paveli]

thanks I thought B but hey you never know what question might stump you these days.

[situational.analysis]

Are they all this easy? Also, what if the victim didn't read english. That's more liability on the city.

[dfinite]

Whoa, missed the answer 2 times. It is too short a video or maybe it’s all rushed into the end? What is the darn correct answer, please? Maybe my ears aren’t as young anymore?

[midashaymaker]

Seems easy tbh. Bunch of Moron lawyers…