Does Jesus Reign on David's Throne Today or in the Millennium? | Acts 15

preview_player
Показать описание
Thank you for watching!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

You can watch the whole Progressive Covenantalism series in order here:

NorthAvenueChurch
Автор

"At present, we do NOT yet see everything in subjection to him." - Hebrews 2:8. // With all the sin & death going on in the world I am thankful to have a hope of something better to come.

t.scottmajor
Автор

I look forward to these teachings every week. You are my brothers for sure. God has gifted you with understanding. Its rarer than we would like to believe.

kimmykimko
Автор

"In those days it will come to pass that ten men from every language of the nations will grasp the corner of the garment of a Jew saying, 'Lets us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you." - Zechariah 8:23 // When did/does this happen in your timeline?

t.scottmajor
Автор

MacArthur, like other dispensationalist, go as far as calling brothers in Christ “antisemites” for not agreeing with their view.

jorgeb
Автор

Excellent. I pray John MacArthur wakes up to correct prophetic eschatology. It’s puzzling to me, how he’s so good on doctrine but dead wrong on this church/Israel thing.

angelawacky
Автор

A lot to chew on here. Am I understanding that we are in the millennial kingdom now?

boatkid
Автор

Amen
You guys always try to defend mc Arthur. When we clearly see how he comes at us that he thinks we are clowns. Because be dont see the dispensation view

Mendezfarriercompany
Автор

Isaiah 16:4-5 says the tent is on the throne. These men claim that this means the tent IS the throne. That is obvious nonsense, because that would mean the throne is also the tent, so the throne would, itself, rest on another instance of this tent/throne thing. In short, you have an infinite stack of thrones which are also tents. Cute honorific concept until you realize that mere men like David and Solomon sat on this thing. Then the idea can clearly be seen for the blasphemy it is. No, Isaiah sees God restoring David's household (his tent) in and through a single individual, the messiah, the one who will sit on His father's (David's) throne.

They read 1 Chronicles 22:10 as God's promise to restore David's throne "in Israel" and then pretend that has no bearing. If Christ's enthronement occurs outside of Jerusalem and Israel altogether, how is the identification of His throne as belonging to His father David not arbitrary?

ArchDLuxe
Автор

Not a single generation of Israelites has gone without a descendant of David sitting in the throne of David. Jesus Christ who is a descendant from David from the tribe of Judah of the line of Pharez earned the right but has not yet taken over that throne because Jesus Christ is sitting on the right hand of the Father in the kingdom of haven. So who has sat in that throne of David, obviously humans but many believe that the last king of Israel was king Zedekiah. Zedekiah was the last king of Judah ( Jews) all the male princes were killed so no one could never again sit in the throne. But many have misunderstood the commission of Jeremiah and many ignore the the daughters of king Zedekiah whom Jeremiah returned to a small city in Judea; God said David s descendants were always going to be kings over Israel. Judah did not inherited the name Israel, Judah became the nation of Judah. The birthright belongs to sara twin brother of Pharez. Pharez committed a breach. The house of Israel was to lose its identity as Israelites and become to believe they were gentiles. Read Jeremiah. God told Jeremiah tear down, root out the crown ( throne) from Judah and plant, plant, plant it. God had told the Moses that god was going to plant Israel in a new land and move no more. Again it was Manasseh and Ephraim who inherited the name Israel not Judah. The throne of David is not in heaven but here on earth. God told David that if they( kings) were to sin God was to punish then with the sword of man. Psalms 89:25 just tell David that his throne was going to be set in the sea also. Where did Jeremiah take the kings daughters after picking them up from mizhpa to plant it. Ireland, Scotland and Great Britain. The line of Sara from the tribe of Judah never enter the promised land. They had headed north west into the sea, the British isles. The ten tribes of the house of Israel lead by Ephraim head been without a king since their captivity by the Assyrians but by the time Judah ( Jews ) were being taken slaves by the Babylonians the house of Israel had gotten their freedom and headed northwest to the coast into the sea. The breach between Pharez and Sara had to heal at a point in time . Many have misinterpreted in Jeremiah where God said I will cut the high cedar green tree and raise the low dry cedar tree and exalted the low tree. Many interpret this as referring to the Jews and gentiles( the church) not at all . God says of Ephraim you are my firstborn. Deuteronomy 32:26 is a curse for the house of Israel not Judah( Jews) but a Jew was always be king over the nation Israel not over the nation of Judah. The history of the kings of Ireland, Scotland and Britain are the descendants of king David from the lines of Pharez and Sara. Jesus said he is coming to sit in the throne of his father David, He is not coming to build it again but take over because it has never stop from existing. Yes Great Britain and it’s commonwealth nations is Ephraim. Genesis 35 and Genesis 48 . Ephraim brother Manasseh was to become a great nation of his own . Is it a coincidence that Great Britain and USA have always called each other brothers. Is it a coincidence that one of our national seals is name the seal of Manasseh.

eugenegarcia