65mm TinyWhoop Prop Testing: Featuring the Wandering Whoop!

GF 1208:

GF 1219S:

T-Motor 12199:

HQProp 31mmx2:

HQProp 31mmx3:

HQProp 31mmx4:

HQProp UL 31mm:

Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:10 Props on test
1:33 Test methods
1:41 Test setup
2:55 Example test: SO CUTE! 😍
3:10 Test results: Motor Mass
4:17 Thrust vs RPM
5:44 Efficiency
6:49 Propwash
8:18 Best props!

[cheetonian]

my man not having gemfan 1210 biblades is a HUGE oversight

[FPV]

+1 for the gemfan 1210 biblade needs to be included. Also needs to be tested on 0702. But the biggest issue i see here is YOU ABSOLUTELY MUST be testing WITH A DUCT! The duct makes a huge difference in the way different props work, and absolutely nobody will be flying 31mm props without a duct. But, awesome content and i very much appreciate your hard work and time put into this! Thank you chris!

[butterflyfpv]

Great work again Chris! It absolutely corresponds to my experiences as an experienced race pilot! I have flown all of these props and can confirm your test results from real life flights.

[bitterrootfpv]

Bummer the gemfan bi-blade was not included.

[baggszilla]

I really like the GemFan 1219S in the Awesome Yellow! Thanks Chris!

[valden]

As others have said, most people run 0702 exclusively on 31mm props so it will change prop results and biblades need to be considered. 802s are more for 35mm and 40mm props.

[ChainsawFPV]

Taking props off with pliers! You monster! Lol

[caujka]

Awesome work! Tanks for sharing!
These new ultralight props really shine in my experience.

[TyranttFPV]

Why are you testing with an 0802 when most 65 whoops use 0702 now days? Does motor size not not make a difference in test results?

[brandonwoodford]

How, just how was there no 1210 biblade. Dude.... Data!

[le_tranq]

HQ ultralight might perform the best but they are also super fragile in comparison to Gemfan 1219S. As others have said I'd love to see the 1210 gemfan in the test data as well as it's also a very nice flying prop and would be great to see it's stats against the competition.

[im_ricebowl]

I love your content man and I'm happy to see more micro drone related content. Thank you so much for your work and I love that intro XD

[SpacemanFPV]

Please hear me out Chris, You absolutely should be doing these tests with a normal 65mm setup with 0702 and ducts

[TWEECH]

Why don’t you have the new gemfan ultralight? 0.9 pitch? Also the new ultralight bi blade

[scottmilano]

These are tiny, but is it possible/worthwhile to test vibration from balance?

[frasersteen]

Really think you should do your usability testing using a battery of 1/4 capacity or by running all 4 props at the same time (only testing 1). I don't think you are ascribing enough weight to efficiency or at least you can't be sure whether or not you are. It's possible that when the system is power limited more efficient motors/props could do better.

[MLeditsofficial]

Can I use 8s on t motor velox v2808 because on website it says it’s rated for 6s but Joshua bardwell was using 8s on those motors

[KwadzUK]

I use bi blade but shape of 1219s on my mob6 2024 and its great albeit a bit of prop wash

[FREEDOMFPV]

What tiny whoop is that with an 03 in looking to buy a tiny whoop that can hold an 03 thanks for the review man 👍👍👍

[grzbiet]

Chris, if you feel like it - how does the efficiency look like when props work backwards?

I always wanted to learn 3D flying and tinywhoop seems perfect platform to do that but the default props on air65 need about 70% of throttle to just hover, even more to stop the fall. I was about to order a bunch and try put the rear props backwards to get the equally bad efficiency in both directions (credit to Zoe) but maybe you can help find better props for 3D flying?