That makes sense.. When Schrödinger came with his wave function equation, wasn't it built to be a mathematical convenience? He made a mathematical framework that explains the probabilities of what will happen, it's not explaining objects.. also probably that there is no objects at all... it's all energies.
mialotusmusic
Well, he's flirting with Bell's inequality without naming her.
BenjaminGatti
Can we please get a follow up with Rupert Spira?
koolmain
its just denying a problem because they dont understand it ...
francesco
I think you mean Barandes “is unmaking waves”😂
richardatkinson
Possibly the unification we thought we would never see.
rudypieplenbosch
I knew that when I first read quantum mechanics 15 years ago.
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
James-lljb
Interesting, “no chasm anymore” but not “no chasm anywhere” If reality is physical as well as mental or emotional, and Hilbert space is unreal and so is mathematics unreal, shouldn’t societal spacetime be the only way to know if this new framework is valid?
balasubr
iam not really sure if this is true, but iam pretty sure that hilbert spaces arent real and that we missunderstood something really important. Damn probability distributions
Thor_Asgard_
Isn't this what the uncertainty principle clearly underlines? Is this revolutionary to apply the uncertainty principle in a general sense ?
LoveofConnectivePhysics
When we don't understand a phenomenon, we used statistics.
uthoshantm
We know Hilbert spaces aren't real. In fact that are generally defined over the field of Complex numbers! 😂
grantarneil
The question is Why does observation matter!?
I tried understanding but essentially I think this is reframing of quantum mechanics - kind of dodging the question isn’t it though…
a meaningful theory, of mind seems inevitable, or at least a universal consciousness perhaps
EG
Isn't this what the uncertainty principle clearly underlines? Is this revolutionary to apply the uncertainty principle in a general sense ?
