Calculator Unboxing Casio fx-CG50 Graphic Calculator (White Box Edition)- Colour Graphing CG50

⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟

⨸ Aʙᴏᴜᴛ Tʜɪs Vɪᴅᴇᴏ ⨸
In this video, we unbox the fx-CG50 graphing calculator from Casio. This came in a white box, rather than the plastic blister pack and comes with necessary connection cables and alkaline batteries.

⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟

⨸ Sᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛ Tʜᴇ Cᴀʟᴄᴜʟᴀᴛᴏʀ Gᴜɪᴅᴇ Bᴇʟᴏᴡ ⨸

⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟
⨸ Cᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ Tʜᴇ Cᴀʟᴄᴜʟᴀᴛᴏʀ Gᴜɪᴅᴇ ⨸

⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟

⨸ Fᴜʀᴛʜᴇʀ Rᴇsᴏᴜʀᴄᴇs & Tᴏᴏʟs ⨸

⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟⍟

𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳, 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘚𝘺𝘮𝘣𝘰𝘭𝘴, 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘴, 𝘐𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴 & 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵 𝘕𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘴. 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘱𝘺𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵© 𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘊𝘰. 𝘓𝘵𝘥 . 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘛𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘴 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘕𝘶𝘮𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘴 & 𝘚𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘱. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘎𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘦.𝘊𝘰𝘮 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘥𝘴 & 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴. 𝘓𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘛𝘰 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘴 & 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘥 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘺 𝘞𝘦𝘣𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘴 𝘈𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴. 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 & 𝘣𝘶𝘺 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘎𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘦.𝘊𝘰𝘮 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭 & 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘴 𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘴.

[mauriciolacruz]

I love this fx-CG50 calculator.

I don't like the huge screen ones (i.e. fx-CP400) because:

1. Large screens consume much more battery.
2. There's little space left for essential physical keys (small keyboard).
3. Very few keys mean more difficult interface and more time consuming for using the functions you need.
4. As the screen is so large and there are very few keys, you need to use a dedicated pencil for the touch-screen, what results in both: being forced to leave on your table your writing pen to hold the calculator's plastic one every time you have to enter data again (with a conventional large keyboard calculator like the fx-CG50 you can still keep holding your writing pen whilst entering data by your fingers, making the process far more quicker, pleasant, convenient and practical) and the risk of losing the dedicated pen.
5. After some time the large screen gets scratched by constant use of the dedicated pen.
6. There's risk of damaging touch-screens by pressing too much and in fact they are more prone to break as they are far more sensible.
7. It's far more pleasant to use a physical keyboard rather than touch-screen, aside of bearing in mind that by pressing a physical key you are 100% sure that your input has been entered, unlike with touch-screens where you need to give enough pressure and confirm constantly by looking to the screen that your values have been entered.

In summary, all I see on large screen / small keyboard calculators are drawbacks and therefore advantages on the conventional smaller screen / large keyboard ones (i.e. fx-CG50).

[MahmudulHasan-ngjk]

"Casio fx-CG50 Graphic Calculator" or "Casio Classpad fx-CP400", can any of those calculator do triple or double integral and partial derivatives? can they do indefinite integral ?

[Majibu]

How did you get it in a box while everyone else got a blister case that only opens when you blow up a gasket. LOL

[migo]

good day sir!

is there any difference between the
Casio Cg50 and the Casio Graph90+e?? performance, features and spec-wisee? otger than more colors and the graph 90+e is french?

and last question

this? or the TI 84 plus CE phyton?
i'm from asia so both calculators are recommended here(sorry for tge bad grammar tho) what are the benefits and downsides of each?

[voisir]

What’s the difference between the plastic packaging and this white box edition?

[AceOfHearts]

If someone from Casio is listening out there. Please bring the ANS button to more powerful calculators. Nightmare.

[mish]

How long do the alkaline batteries last?

[Aman-ukcs]

How do I charge this thing? Do I need to replace the batteries or do I charge it with the cable

[ColorMaster]

can buttons get washed out, like on fx991es plus
number pad is engraved but function buttons(upper) like sin, cos, tan are just printed on and can be rubbed off with time
How is this handled on cg50?

[aronbeast]

Casio has better packaging for their scientific calculators than the graphical calculator which cost like more than 10 times than scientific one...