when we were black.

[justinsarfo]

Hey man, like you're channel so far.

I was wondering if you could perhaps analyze or do a video on this study from last year (2023) titled "Reconstructing past human genetic variation with ancient DNA: case studies from ancient Egypt and medieval Europe" by Morez A, because in the study there are apparently old kingdom dna samples with a strong connection to levantine natufians.

I wanted to know your thoughts on it, and what its implications are on the idea or possibility of black people being present and being the original founders of ancient egypt.

[Changamira]

The title doesn't suit the content. In any case European scholars will always use half truths, conjecture and contradictions to dehumanise Africans for our antiquity. An antiquity, which is referred to as archaic, which is an off hand to mean primitive. Because we are raised, and entrenched in an obsession with evolution equating higher intelligence in species. So the belief that the further removed and divergent you are from Africaness, the more human you must be. When there really isn't proof that human intellect is a direct result of divergent evolution. All great apes are intellectual, perceptive and some can count and remember faster than we can blink. However, that isn't considered an advanced intellectual accumin, because humans don't function like that. Human has been made the defacto end all, be all of intellect. Lastly, archaic admixture couldn't have been from a non human race. Offspring, we are told, of two seperate species cannot couple, let alone leave genetic markers. Proving that the term archaic, like the term primitive before it, are weaponised to imply non human admixture, in effect dehumanising or subhumanising Africans. When in reality, all homonins from H.Erectus onwards were infact simply humans. Yes, there is no proof to suggest these were not people, in the sense that a chinese and a Nilote are two very different types of the same species
Nearnderthals are never referred to as archaic, because the accuser openly admits he is of his ilk. Yet so are Papuans, Aboriginals, Chinese. So i guess neanderthal admixture is then described as archaic admixture for those POC right? See what i'm getting at?