JPMorgan's Dimon on Ukraine: 'We Can't Have a Bad Outcome'

preview_player
Показать описание
JPMorgan Chase Chair and CEO Jamie Dimon says nuclear proliferation is the biggest risk to mankind during an Institute for International Finance (IIF) event. (Source: IIF)

--------
More on Bloomberg Television and Markets


Connect with Bloomberg Television on:

Connect with Bloomberg Business on:

More from Bloomberg:


Watch more on YouTube:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Jamie Dixon, thank you for your insight.

peterabrownjr
Автор

We need clarity on what Dimond is saying.

Larryake
Автор

It’s pretty scary to live in a time when we don’t know what awaits next. The best solution is for all to learn to respect each other and what belongs to them.

thinkandquestion
Автор

Is this because the bank have a large amount of unrealized losses which they can't bear under the current circumstances, so they have to start a bigger war in order to find a way to wipe off the debt? This makes total sense, If I was in his situation, I would also be so desperate even to start a war. I think he may even go to jail if this thing go sour.

TomLee-er
Автор

Judge Napolitano w/ Gilbert Doctorow - Putin, Xi and BRICS

ramstrong
Автор

"The US must be allowed to station nukes 7 mins flight time to Moscow!" - yup, that makes a lot of sense, Jamie :-)

donkeychan
Автор

Pessimistic: we all vanish
Optimistic: all nations learn to respect each other and coexist

thinkandquestion
Автор

I don't know how you can promote stopping nuclear proliferation around the world, when the case literally is: Ukraine surrendered its arsenal and ended up invaded by a permanent member of UN Security Council.

xealit
Автор

Inside China Business - Lessons from Ukraine, our fighting doctrine is fatally flawed

ramstrong
Автор

Most Ukraine people want to end the war so they could have a chance to go back normal life. And then there is a multi billionaire from US said 'We Can't Have a Bad Outcome' 🤣🤣. This is ironically disgusting.

TomLee-er
Автор

A billionaire banker wanting war hah that's not new

MMHoldingsInc
Автор

The Russian bots have clearly arrived in the comment section.

vladlock
Автор

Dimon should stick to finance -- like Buffett said, Dimon should stay in his circle of (in)competence -- without getting into international relations cluelessly

svnblm
Автор

if you think Dimon's statement about nuclear blackmail is not one-sided, think again. What country wants to be invaded? Russia wanting Crimea and Dombas is more legit than EU wanting Kosovo for Washington army presence and Croatia for navy presence. Not something you hear on MM, right?

doloressverko
Автор

The odds of success in Ukraine have already been determined by the ratio of those there that mobilized for the war effort. 5% maybe 10%. He's asking the struggling tax payer to gamble on those odds, but he wouldn't himself.

RegiEuropa
Автор

What would be a bad outcome? maybe it’s time for the consumption driven culture in the United States to get serious about life and bringing our government back to where it’s accountable? The question that should be asked is how could/how did the Republican party allow Donald Trump to take charge?

Charles-zl
welcome to shbcf.ru