Analyzing Trump vs Kamala Debate w/ Ana Kasparian

preview_player
Показать описание
Subscribe to the Channel for more Podcasts like this!

Join Jillian as she explores the surprising reasons behind Ana Kasparian's move away from the left.
Ana Kasparian, co-founder of The Young Turks, one of the most popular left-leaning news organizations, recently departed from the left, sending shockwaves through the political landscape and raising questions about her decision.

In this episode, Ana shares her growing disillusionment with the increasing radicalism and intolerance within extreme left factions. She also addresses deep concerns about identity politics, corporate funding of political parties, the decline of California, and the embracing of endorsements from figures like Dick Cheney.

Ana's commitment to intellectual honesty and her desire for constructive dialogue ultimately pushed her away from the community she once embraced. Exposure to alternative perspectives through media appearances with the likes of Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Tomi Lahren and more broadened her understanding of the political spectrum, making it difficult for her to align with any ideology.

Later in the episode, Ana reveals her "final straw": the public backlash and attacks she faced from her own party for expressing nuanced views on a highly polarizing issue.

Ana's departure has significant implications for the future of progressive politics. Without her voice, the left risks becoming more radicalized and isolated. However, Ana's decision could also open the door for a more moderate, inclusive, and intellectually honest political approach that values debate and free thought over dogma.

What do you think of Ana Kasparian's decision to leave the left? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and don't miss our latest video on political shifts and ideological evolution!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Please read the bill. It was still going to let 5000 illegals in a day. That’s 1.8 million illegals per year and it had 60 billion for Ukraine

lucabrazi
Автор

Ladies- You are more intelligent than that. Read the bill and see why it was flawed.

jeffdavis
Автор

Come onnnn ladies! They dont need a damn bill to close the border! Trump closed it without a damn bill! And the bill didn't come close to closing the border! Billions more to Ukraine too. Stopppp

staceywutzke
Автор

Trump talked about the murderers all the time, but no one seems to care, as soon as he says cats and dogs, he got all the attention. He won, hands down

rickrolls
Автор

Fact. If Trump would have never said the cats and dogs comment. The matter would have continued to be ignored by the media.

c.j.
Автор

The Immigration bill was going to spend way more money on other things (like funding overseas wars), than spending on helping immigration and the border. It has $118 BILLION worth of spending, but only around $22 billion would help immigration/border. I don't know why they called it an "Immigration" bill. It should have been called a Military Aid bill.

skyride
Автор

I just saw a Springfield town hall meeting video the other day and they are claiming this stuff is happening and weren’t happy their mayor or whoever it was denied it during press conference

jride
Автор

The immigration bill was more of an amnesty bill. I’m glad it was rejected.

elmitchification
Автор

I read the bill they tried to push pass in congress for immigration still allowed over several thousand people a day and added funds to Ukraine and more. It would have given more money for border patrol processing people.

toddheath
Автор

There are people in the town saying the animals are being taken and killed. Do some research.

anthonycosentino
Автор

The first immigration bill had 5000 illegals a day to come into the country, and the second had 2500 a day. How are these good bills?!?!?!

charleslaurseniii
Автор

TDS fully engaged, Trump did push back on Tariffs. WTH is Ana even talking about?

thedaythatendsinY
Автор

If the democrat party says something believe the opposite. It’s darn near a guarantee you will be right.

WestTnOutdoors-mbfh
Автор

trump was also in a very frustrating setup where the moderators were clearly biased against him. ABC should never host another political debate, ever again. why did trump have to debate the moderators, they weren't wait a minute, neither was harris. harris did not win a single vote, she was not nominated in any type of a process. she was installed.

andrewdonohue
Автор

So much for being a “journalist” Anna
Too lazy to do research? Have you even bothered to read the bill?

l_a_u_y
Автор

What about the 9-11 calls over the last 2 years? What about the police body cam video? What about actually talking to the Haitians and finding out it's a common practice? Hummmm??? To a lesser degree, the photos because those can't be verified as easily. I love this journey your taking Jillian, why don't you research it a little more? You might actually find the truth. Do you want to find the truth? It is out there and very easy to find nowadays.

Jabronibologna
Автор

I'm sick and tired of people saying there not eating cats when it actually happened 😒 😑

We
Автор

Is not like there isn't video supporting what he

border
Автор

By the way...I am MAGA all the way! I love the guests you are having on. I love that you have Matt W. on. I don't agree with everything he says. We are not a monolith. You are asking some GREAT questions. Make sure you continue to have "Right-sided" guests, ask all the questions. I just subscribed. I'm looking forward to watching your videos. Thank you

Jabronibologna
Автор

This woman right here has done the research and I am proudly voting Trump! You're a complete fool if you don't.

jwaddell