3 things every philosopher should be able to do!

[naiosndionaewneoiqnqwnd]

Dude, I'm loving these clips. I like everything Huemer says though 🤣

[jotteredits]

Some Continental concepts are inherently obscure. It’s not that the philosophers aren’t sometimes trying to be clear. The concepts often can’t be explained in normal language, and that obviously doesn’t make them invalid.
Kant was pretty obscure- I wouldn’t say that makes him a bad philosopher at all, in fact he’s probably one of the best.

Also, most continental philosophers do argue for their views- I do not know what he’s talking about there.

Most continental philosophy is system building- so you don’t really need to debunk opposing positions. Again, Kant never addressed counter arguments in the critique of pure reason. Sure he was opposing rationalism and empiricism, but he didn’t anticipate counter arguments explicitly, he simply built a system.

[onlyflair]

why would continental philosopher do what analytic philosophers dont? but both have contibuted to human history. Why not appreciate both appproaches for their unique way of interpreting the universe?

[philkallberg]

Most continental philosophers don't do those things. A few do but they are the rare exception.

[hasanunver]

Alright then we can call Plato an analytic philosopher

[mattgkunz]

If you agree with this point, you should go to law school instead.

[ParkersPensees]

Putting these episodes together takes a lot of research and a ton of time. If you enjoy my high effort philosophy and theology podcast episodes, consider supporting me on Patreon:

[Kevin-hrpf]

I'm a Purified Philosophical Painter

[natanaellizama]

Why? Ironically, I think no arguments were given for this position, nor any possible objections were addressed.

I also find it odd in a Christian channel. Was Jesus, clear, gave his stated reasons like in syllogisms, and did he offer counter? Yet was Jesus not a thinker?