Understanding SQL Server's Handling of Date Comparisons as Strings

This guide explores how SQL Server compares date strings, the implications of such comparisons, and the performance considerations involved.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How does SQL Server handle a comparison between dates when both are strings?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How SQL Server Handles Date Comparisons When Both Are Strings

When working with SQL Server, you might encounter situations where you're comparing dates stored as strings. This scenario can lead to unexpected behaviors if you're unsure how SQL Server interprets these comparisons. In this guide, we'll delve into how SQL Server handles date comparisons when both sides of the comparison are strings, and what this means for your SQL queries.

The Problem: Comparing Date Strings

Let's consider the following example: You have a column named date which stores dates in the format YYYY-MM-DD as strings. You may attempt to compare it like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This query seems straightforward and works without throwing an error. However, when you replace the string 2001 with arbitrary text, such as:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You might find the results confusing. Why does comparing a date string with a non-date string yield unexpected results?

Expected Behavior vs. Actual Behavior

Date String Comparison: In the first case, the database compares date strings correctly because 2021 is recognized as a digit string, and this comparison follows the natural order of numbers.

Non-Date String Comparison: In the second case, you're comparing a date string with a letter-based string. SQL Server does not cast these strings into date types because it cannot ascertain that they should be interpreted as dates. Instead, the comparison is treated as a string comparison according to the database's collation settings.

How SQL Server Interprets Comparisons

SQL Server does not perform implicit casting for string comparisons unless it understands that the strings represent date formats. Here’s how it operates:

Your Strings as Strings: If both date and the comparison value are strings, SQL Server treats them literally as strings, leading to varying results based on the collation settings of your database.

Collation Order: Generally, in most collations, numeric strings come before alphabetic strings. Thus, any year like 2021 will be considered less than any string starting with a letter.

Impact on Performance

You raised another important point regarding performance. When comparing strings, the query may perform slower compared to comparing proper date types. Here's how to approach this:

Casting Date Columns: If you know that you will frequently be querying with date comparisons, it would be beneficial to cast the entire date column to a date type. This ensures that SQL Server handles the comparisons as dates rather than strings, improving efficiency and clarity:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Consider Implicit Casting: While SQL Server might perform implicit casts in some scenarios, relying on it can lead to unreliable results, especially when your data's format is inconsistent.

Conclusion

Understanding how SQL Server handles string comparisons, especially with date strings, is critical for writing effective and efficient queries. Always be cautious if your comparisons involve strings that could represent dates, and whenever possible, prefer using proper date types for comparison. Considering performance hits due to string comparisons can save you time and resources in the long run.

By keeping these principles in mind, you can ensure that your SQL queries yield accurate results and operate at optimal performance. Happy querying!