Vivo X200 Pro vs Galaxy S24 Ultra Camera Comparison | 180+ photos & videos to help you decide!

In this camera comparison video, I'll compare the Vivo X200 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra with over 180 photos & videos to help you decide which phone has the best camera! If you're in the market for a new phone with a great camera, this video is a must-watch!

SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:

EQUIPMENT I USE TO MAKE VIDEOS:

FOLLOW ME:

Timecodes:
00:00 Rear camera video (Cinematic video, indoors)
00:50 Rear camera photos (Daytime)
07:24 Rear camera video (Daytime)
10:43 Front camera photos (Daytime)
11:17 Front camera video (Daytime)
12:52 Rear camera photos (Low light)
14:53 Rear camera video (Low light)
16:31 Front camera photos (Low light)
17:02 Front camera video (Low light)

DISCLAIMER: Some of the links above might be affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission from your purchase at no extra cost to you. Your purchase helps to support this channel, and is much appreciated.

[xiagm-kemasmfadlic]

Wow I didn't expect Samsung turn out very good... All this time i always see people bash Samsung... But they did better than iphone

[govardhanposina]

6:34 1380 mm digital zoomed in shot from Vivo is insane, like wow, thought samsung was holding up really well in zoom shots until then

[akshaymykar]

Vivo needs to work on potrait shots, the highlights are blown out which also takes away minute details, also it's blur is not consistent, it can't distinguish the edges of certain objects and people.

Samsung
Too dark in certain pictures, needs to work with highlight consistency, some pictures are bright some are dark.

[威李-tq]

In terms of photography, Vivo wins; for video recording, Samsung takes the lead. I'm looking forward to the arrival of the S25 Ultra.

[cockcock]

Even though the Vivo clearly wins in many photos, the S24 ultra really surprised me with its performance despite having ancient camera hardware in the phone. Goes to show how processing is as important as having good hardware. If my focus is to yake videos and photos during the day between 0.5x-5X, I'd pick the Samsung overall.

[keamogetsweizaac]

I didn't expect the Samsung to be good. Wow, the natural processing-something I thought I'd never day about Samsung-is really good, the skin tones, contrast and dynamic range is excellent. Vivo needs to tune it, I will say though, it's details are just superior, their textures, depth, very natural, especially when you extend closer to your subject with portrait mode, but their highlight control needs work,

[codonthichchodongnguoi]

Your review is perfect as always. I think zoom quality in low light should be added cuz high-en devices should be excelled in this aspect. Thank you.

[MrDavidsic]

I was waiting for this one because I have an S24U and I might be interested in this X200 Pro when it is available globally but it is not so obvious to say which one is the best. The Samsung remains globally good. The difference is especially during long zoom where the Vivo keeps a more natural rendering in the processing. The night video part with the rear camera the Vivo seems out of focus. Thank you Grant for this comparison and the others 👌

[NeerajPS-nntx]

Im planning to buy Vivo X200 Pro. In last 2 comparisons Vivo got massive lens flare exactly at the same spot during Rear camera video. Please review once again after the camera update regarding the improvements.

[neilmcguinness]

Yes, the S24U clearly has the more polished and effective camera system, as befits something that has been on release for over 8 months now with lots of fine tuning done via camera software updates. The Vivo is quite good and should only get better with time.

[lekidusyared]

IN MOST CASE S24U IS CLEAR WINER BUT VIVO'S SKY IS MORE REALISTIC

[todorzhelyazkov]

Both phones are very good if you know how to use the camera and settings and understand photography. But I am amazed by such a small phone like Vivo for me personally it's an Android Iphone also not to forget have a strong processor as well as battery for such a size phone. About Samaung i can say it is unique too even i think my next phone to be S25 ultra i never had Samsung.

[maggot]

Samsung has performed surprisingly well, somewhere worse in photos, somewhere better in videos, but we must understand that vivo has just been launched and there will be many updates, and Samsung has already been polished, also the s24u still costs from $ 850 in my region, and vivo can already be bought for $ 750. And the real battle will begin next year between x200u and s25u.

[HABO]

Damn, I'm shocked. All this time I thought x200 pro rocked the competition. Then comes s24u that clearly outshines it in most scenarios.

[TedThomasTT]

something that you don't see with these videos is that the vivo shooting experience is much nicer for photographers

[shahriarhossain]

The video was well detailed and full of needed info, good one.

[kazino]

Thankyou for the excellent comparison.
Looks like Samsung might have updated its software, it appeared to be miles behind the vivo x100 pro and ultra, but now it's even perfroming better in some scenarios 😮

[RdL.N]

Hello, very good comparison. The Vivo X200 Pro, I've been disappointed, I thought it was much better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, and it's not. I want to change my Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra. I'll wait for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, or the Vivo X200 Ultra. Greetings.

[Ankyyy]

Honestly speaking S24 Ultra is giving awesome tuff fight to X200 Pro....

[Namprikong]

15:32 It looks like you didn't set autofocus on x200 pro.