How to Configure Automapper in C# to Prevent Instantiation of Nested Classes with Null Properties

A guide for C# developers on how to use `Automapper` to prevent unnecessary instantiation of nested classes when mapping to DTOs, focusing on handling null properties effectively.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: C# Automapper 10.1.1 creates instance of nested class, although all members are null

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Configure Automapper in C# to Prevent Instantiation of Nested Classes with Null Properties

Introduction

In the realm of software development, one challenge that C# developers often face is dealing with data transfer objects (DTOs) and their mapping to domain models. A common use case involves nested classes, which can complicate the mapping process, especially when they contain properties that might be null. This guide addresses a specific problem related to this: preventing Automapper from creating an instance of a nested class when all of its properties are null.

The Problem

You may have a scenario where you need to map an Order class to an OrderDTO class while flattening its nested properties, particularly a Description class. However, when you configure Automapper, you might inadvertently find that it instantiates the Description object even when all its properties are null. Here is a structured breakdown of the classes involved:

Class Definitions

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Common Mapping Configuration

When setting up your mappings with Automapper, you might have the following basic configuration:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this seems sufficient, it reveals an issue when OrderDTO is instantiated without DescriptionText properties and mappings are executed. Even without explicit values, Automapper will create instances of nested classes like Description, leading to unwanted behavior.

Solution: Custom Mapping for Nested Classes

To specifically handle this issue with the Description class without losing the flow of mapping in other instances, you can configure your mappings explicitly. The solution involves customizing the mapping from PositionDTO back to Position. Here’s how you can achieve this:

Updated Mapping Configuration

Replace the existing configuration with the following code to handle nulls effectively:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Solution

Explicit Mapping for Nested DTOs: The customization of the mapping for PositionDTO back to Position ensures that if the DescriptionText1 is null, Description will also remain null instead of being instantiated.

Conditional Object Mapping: By using the MapFrom method, you can conditionally create the Description object only when there are actual values to assign. This prevents unnecessary object instantiation.

Conclusion

While the solution may not seem elegant, it effectively addresses the need to control instances of nested classes when certain properties are null. By configuring Automapper properly, you can maintain the desired behavior in your application without incurring performance penalties from unnecessary object creation. This technique can be invaluable in ensuring that your data mapping remains efficient and effective in real-world applications.

Final Thoughts

Mapping can often get complex, especially with nested classes in C# . By leveraging tools like Automapper` judiciously, you can simplify your code while ensuring it meets all functional requirements.

If you're facing similar challenges, consider exploring these techniques further for a cleaner, more maintainable codebase.