In Crisis Samsung's Future TVs NOT what you think!

preview_player
Показать описание
===
🛒OLED TV Deals
——
====
🛒QLED MiniLED
——

==
As an Associate and affiliate of the retailers linked above (such as LG, Sony, Samsung, Best Buy, Crutchfield, Amazon), I earn from qualifying purchases when you click on my links in this channel. Also, all of my other merchant links in this video description, linked pages and community and comment section are affiliate links to different merchants (including but not limited to Best Buy, Crutchfield, Samsung, etc.) which means at no extra charge to you, I will make a small commission if you click on them and make a qualifying purchase. Thanks for your support!

Samsung in Crisis: Future TVs NOT what you think!
samsung qdoled,oled tv,samsung qd oled,samsung s95 vs,best oled tv,samsung tv,miniled tv,tcl qm7,samsung vs tcl,tcl vs samsung,tcl qm8,lg b4,samsung s90d,samsung du9000,samsung 98 inch,samsung 98",best 98 inch tv,98" tv,98 inch tv under,98" tv under,under 2000,best 98 inch under 2000,best 98" under 2000,blue pho oled,samsung tv wont turn on,oled tv gaming,oled tv vs qled,qled vs oled vs qled vs oled,samsung tv screen problems
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The more they focus their R&D and production on QD Oled and Micro-Led's, the sooner the prices will come down, the better for our wallets as consumers ... cause i aint payin $5000 for an 65 inch 8K LCD tv while i can get an QD-oled for less than half the price, with the better picture.

Kivancli
Автор

Working at Best Buy for over 8 years, 90% of the customers would state they don’t see a difference between and oled an a standard led tv. What they did was get the biggest tv and then use the tv speakers. Didn’t matter how much we would show them direct comparison for the picture quality or how the tv sucks compared to even the standard soundbars. Not saying it’s right but just like streaming people want to pay as little as possible for the most they can get.

ovlivion
Автор

Source material is the difference. If you watch cable or YoutubeTV and streaming platforms then improved image quality doesn’t move the needle. If you game and watch 4K Blu Rays with HDR then it does.

brodelicious
Автор

Yep I think you're right. I can't count the number of ads recently displaying 85" to 100"+ TVs. It's only larger TVs, and I'm usually interested in 65" max.. 😅 But it works... All the hype and reduced price for larger TVs now makes me consider purchasing a 77" instead for my next buy... It's a wild time for TV enthousiats.

rimlatv
Автор

Samsung Electronics is lucky that Samsung Display kept developing QDO & that they eventually got forced to market it. Imagine their short term outlook without it.

highdefnews
Автор

I perfectly understand the message. I own a 65" Oled looking to go slightly larger to 75/77". Due to price of Oled at those sizes, I'm looking at mid-tier mini LED as they are good enough at this point. I could grab a 75" Qm8 for $1300 on Black Friday vs $2000+ for Oled 77".

Can I afford 77" Oled? Sure can. Do I want to spend almost double for one? Not anymore. I don't keep them for very long time.

Jodez
Автор

I get your point.
But i disagree with not improving tech. Companies should always innovate and improve.
Whatever improvement TV makers make, eventually with time it will translate into a cheaper mid range or lower tier model. Take the QM7 for example; if improvement stops and they only forced on size, then we wouldn't have a 98" QM7 with this level of image improvement(brightness, mini-led, local dimming) at that price.
Also we don't have to buy flagship Tvs if you can't and TV makers doesn't need to produce too much flagship Tvs either and focus more on mid and lower tier. But keep the improvements and innovations going.

rohanchooramun
Автор

I wish your channel would discuss the declining quality of Samsung tv's. What good are they if the new models are designed to only last 5 years.

JFPriest
Автор

Also, Samsung's 2024 model's started at about $1000 more than the similar model 2023 models. overpriced!! Then the sales knock it down $1000 like they have done something for you. That basically puts it back to where it should have started in the first place!! WTH is going on?? Samsung better get their shitz together!! And I'm a Samsung guy!!

kcstereo
Автор

The biggest improvement in TV picture quality would be if the day ever comes when more broadcasts and streams are in 4K. 4K TV's for the most part do a great job displaying a quality image if given a quality source and at what point will the human eye see the difference in higher resolution like the failed 8K? I wish the push in technology was in that direction instead of TV manufacturers trying to keep improving upscaling low bit rate content to try to make it look better in 4K.

When I have been at stores watching a salesman showing what I will call average customers TV's they almost always going for the one cheaper in price. Could be strictly a budget decision or they just don't see a big enough difference in picture quality to justify the price increase of the other TV which is what Fomo was talking about. I almost never see the average customer look at the TV from the side to notice how washed out the picture looks on most LCD TV's when viewing off angle. Sometimes I have had customers ask me what I think. I try to stay out of their buying decision but the one thing I have suggested to them is if their budget allows it get the biggest size TV they can afford because the immersion impact is real. For us enthusiasts of course we want the best picture quality we can get but even most of us have a price breaking point where we say that picture is good enough than the more expensive TV.

kommandantklink
Автор

I'm torn with a similar choice for an 83" OLED. Go with the Samsung S90C or pick the LG G4. They look very similar to me, but the 5 year panel warranty is swaying me towards the G4.

TonyFontanesi
Автор

I think TVs are all good enough on the picture quality side. Reliability will be the future goal post.

gibsonpickens
Автор

Size, by far, makes the biggest difference. My 77" A80J, is way way better to watch movies on, than my 65" A95k qdoled. You will barely miss any pq difference, but the size is a huge difference in immersion. No you can't just sit closer. The size of the objects on the screen are more life size, that doesn't change with your seating distance.

micker
Автор

I think image quality is where it needs to be now. What I want TV manufacturers to focus on is reliability.

I have my current TV with 13 months now and after 6 months the dirty screen effect started showing. With the past week when I turn on the TV the screen lights up but nothing shows. I have to put it into standby and turn it on again for an image to show.

When I bought the TV 13 months ago I registered for the 2 year warranty and I paid for a 6 year no quibble warranty with richer sounds. For the first 2 years it's up to Philips to repair or replace the TV after that if the TV fails richer sounds will replace it with a similarly priced TV if they can't repair it.

It seems reliability in TVs has declined a lot in the past 8 - 10 years.

In 2021 I bought a Philips 58pus8535 for €700 and the screen gave up just after 13 months.

Stevex
Автор

Paying 20% to get 80% quality will always win against paying 100% for a 100% of the quality, let alone the fact that right now we can pay 20% for 90-95% of the quality.

Death_Saved
Автор

IMO what is needed is what Samsung used to and may still be researching and developing. The "QNED" the Quantum Nano-rod Emissive display. Basically in-organic "OLED".
It would eliminate MiniLED and OLED all together. If it can be easily produced and come down in price from initial costs.
Because it would be 100% OLED blacks, but no burn in risk at all. No ASBL dimming all the colors will be there and brightness as well etc. Almost a holy grail TV.

Or quite simply if they can replace the organic blue in QD OLED with in-organic one. Or some "white in organic" and then if somehow blue can be incorporated into Quantum dots.

Swecan
Автор

Size is the way to go! I have an 85", yet I wanna go bigger next ... preferrabley 8K 115" with cheap LEDs.

Rex
Автор

Regarding blue pholed, you have to consider ongoing regulations about TV power requirements.

greendale
Автор

Samsung has regrettably been a marketing first company and it has cost them dearly over the years. Living in a city where having a one thousand square foot condo is considered huge, a 65" TV is large and given this restriction OLED is the only way to go.

roccobruno
Автор

It’s funny you mention the iPad Pro, because my exact plan was to buy the iPad this year if and ONLY if they give it a bigger screen size. Same as the TV market, I’d bet a lot of iPad users would’ve poured their money into a larger display. I’m also a digital artist and among my friends who also have iPads, I can say with certainty that a lot of them would’ve loved to see a 16” or even 20” “iPad Canvas” type device. Size 100% matters lol

marcellofrisina