£219.6m in, £153.3 out | A summary of Chelsea's summer transfer window

A summary of Chelsea's summer transfer window.

#SkySportsNews #SkySports #chelsea

More from Sky Sports on YouTube:

[ForeTheBoyss]

i am actually bored how they just talk about us all the time

[AbdulB]

Finally some fair pundits. Showing Chelsea’s incoming and also their outgoings. Their net spend is much better than that of many clubs

[Bartizzle]

Why is it still just Chelsea. Brighton have spent nearly as much and sold nowhere near

[kaushikpuranik]

-66 million, to think that if sterling, broja, chilwell and kepa left for a combined total of 100 million we would have been in considerable net profit is seriously good business!!

[KMD-qjqc]

Chelsea have spend £600
Million roughly on players 8 months ago and last year, they capitalised that over 8 years since the players are on 8 year contracts, so that’s £75 million a year, (600/8), then the football ffp rules changes and they said Todd must do it over 5 years instead of 8 so this years spend will be £300 million ish and will be reducing to £60 million a year. That means Chelsea are losing £75 million from each year, from the spend last year +£60 million this year but Chelsea have also sold £250 million worth of players in 2 transfer windows all for a profit.

Over the 3 windows Chelsea booked somewhere in the region of £200 million worth of transfer gains and they are reducing it by £135 million per year which means they are £65 million in credit on the balance sheet against transfers however of Chelsea dosent pull up revenue this will catch up with them.

If your deprecating that at £135 million per year and you just sold £260 million pounds worth of players (most of them for a profit), you’ve just coverd 18 months of loses and going into next year as well.

Also in the summer of 23/24 season they sold over 145 million worth of players

[kennethryan]

Sancho doesn't come into it cus it's a loan and doesn't register till nxt season

[astradala]

I mean that’s good business. Minus 60 odd million, pretty impressive business.

[QuicknStraight]

When are you people in the media going to understand that simply comparing purchase and sale prices is meaningless. Players who are sold/loaned book all the fees immediately. Players who are purchased have the fee amortoised over the length of the contract. Don't you understand the difference????

[salimrehman]

This is good, Chelsea is showing a strong capital of money, and many players are willing to come to Chelsea.

[atlebentzen]

Dont forget the wage bill slashed by several millions, so net spend cut to 20-30m.

[rinlyri]

Where are the haters who saying Chelsea is spending Billions.. ? ? 😂 They quiet now huh? .. American may be horrible at football but what they are great at is business.. 😂

[djsejwal]

Big salary players are also out. That helps to get cheap salary players

[LT-]

And when it doesn’t work, do it all again next summer.

[_._._._X]

were is City's detailed spending.

[waynemarshall]

When it’s broken down like this…its not that bad

[krishchaudhry]

And after spending 200m + we still dont have a world class centre back and we still coudnt get a world class forward, the two main holes are still empty !!

[ryandavis]

Why cant the owners spend big on a solid defence for once. Get Tomori back for starters as well 🤦‍♂️

[francisellis]

Sky sports never got time for westham

[mutagubyaabdukaweesi]

Chelsea owner first worked on balancing books, they found the club with debts

[anthonysmurthwaite]

Zero squad consistency will mean most of their young talented players will get wasted