Ep 6. The SECRET behind how they carved hard stone!

preview_player
Показать описание
Join this channel to get access to perks:
We accept CRYPTO donations, please use Etherium, Binance Smarch Chain, AVAX, SOL, Or MATIC
0xBc74449F2521BBe61E42F1e9a13aa09a8b769877

How Africans Invented Mathematics

The Largest civilization in history

The TRUE Cradle of civilization

VIDEO CHAPTERS
0:00 Intro
2:20 Chapter 1: Mudbricks
6:10 Chapter 2: Concrete and geopolymer
10:45 Chapter 3: Stone carvings
14:35 Chapter 4: Complex form reproduction
16:45 Chapter 5: Obelisk
24:30 Chapter 6: Stone Drilling
28:40 Chapter 7: Bonus

#withouthistory #uncharted #metatronscube

Sources
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Hi Noble ones! If you find this informative. Please SHARE. Love ❤️ you all regardless of your melanin concentration.

withoutHistory
Автор

My first job was as a trainee sculptor in London and I can accept the limestone concrete theory... but carving Amenhotep III's statue and a multitude like it in various granite stones... or the granite boxes at the Serapeum of Saqqara with dolerite hammers and a copper chisels? Hilarious!

allanhansford
Автор

The oldest construction has the highest level of craftsmanship. Those extremely old vases were built to a fine level that we are just now advanced enough to measure. Just because some race claims possession of a land, doesn't mean that they built it.

Michael-rgmx
Автор

Not to diminish the advanced technology, skill, and brilliant minds of the people who lived during these times, but there are far too many unanswered questions to claim totally resolved, especially due to the massive scale and precision of these endeavors.

bradleymsmith
Автор

What a huge assumption in reasoning is this video. I give it a 10 Pinocchio's !

ronbrown
Автор

I am all for K.I.S.S. being the most likely scenario for the construction methods. I think the thing that puzzles me the most is the moving and lifting of some of the largest stones weighing in at 80+ tons or more to the heights that they were as not all of the stones are geopolymers.

sirretsnom
Автор

Does not show the level of perfection of some of the carved bowls that are carved perfectly round to a few thousands of an inch with handles, that would not be able to be achieved in your way shown. Also 1000 plus tonne stones shipped 500kms away that are also perfectly shaped, and many, many more statues heads, all geometrically perfectly made to CNC machine type quality.

brettrussell
Автор

Unfortunately measuring the ago of stone is not possible so these dates are just predictions based on biological material left in or around the sites in question. Those stone pots in the in kemet still found today in museums had walls that where so thin it's blows people's minds. Also the stones used in the pyramids construction are natural solid stone from bedrock and many locations show stone still left in bedrock but they did use geopolymer to fill the games in the outer limestone but not in the inside granite chambers and pathways. Plus you can still see unfinished stonework outside the pyramids with huge saw cuts and tub drill holes just sitting there as if people wouldn't notice. My issue is how people will still believe in nonsense like they where buriel chambers for pharaohs 🤦🏾‍♂️.

Darara
Автор

While these techniques might have worked for the limestone blocks, they would not have worked for the "sarcophagus" found in the king's chamber, the accuracy of stone placement inside the pyramid, or the Ramesses statues, as they don't account for the perfect leveling and edging, the circular saw marks or the overcuts (mistakes) we find.

The vases are particularly problematic, because we know with 100% certainty after doing a 3d scan of the objects and measuring their symmetry and consistency that they could not be done by hand. I can link you to the study if you'd like. The same would have to be done for the tube drill cores. But engineers now looking at them believe it would not have been possible by hand either.

Similar to the sphinx, it is far more likely that many of these objects were built before the dynastic Egyptians were around, closer to 9000-12000 years ago or more. Our current dating methods use the hieroglyphs found on the objects to arrive at a conclusion, but this is problematic because the level of the sophistication between the items themselves and the hieroglyphs simply don't add up and do not have anything close to the same level of finish. It was also common for Pharaohs to put their names on items that they did not build, and many texts speak about how they inherited their civilization from an older more advanced one.

There's so much that could be said, including how they even would have moved 2000 ton stone blocks, or the scoop marks found in hard stone, but I highly recommend looking at the work of Christopher Dunn (a leading engineer on the matter of ancient Egypt and author of "The Giza Powerplant") and UnchartedX (who's channel you can find on YouTube). They provide a lot of evidence and many testimonies from other engineers as well that point to a much higher level of advancement that what is commonly thought. I would say their approach is also highly scientific, so no ancient aliens nonsense.

The evidence pointing to an older dating for many of these works is actually a good thing for those trying to prove the "African-ness" of the builders, as the farther you go back in time, the "darker" the region probably becomes. But this, to me, is of secondary importance (despite my being from Africa)

josephelijah
Автор

Them folks just don’t want to admit that romans didn’t invent concrete

KenyattaGross
Автор

As soon as they couldn't pretend that Egyptians were white they want to attribute the Great African Civilization to Aliens. 😂😅😅 Just pathetic.

sassiea
Автор

So how did they get perfect bilateral and three-dimensional symmetry on really complex statues like Khufu? How doe these techniques explain the really fine details which are perfectly symmetrical?
the stone working, sure... but what about their unexplainable accuracy?
Not that I doubt they couldn't do it... but just exactly HOW did they do it?
I still think there are massive gaps in understanding exactly how they did it, and there are likely techniques and skills that are not part of the 'known techniques' mentioned.

And while its not aliens, thats still an unknown advanced technology ... doesnt have to be friggen lazers, but they definitely knew shit then, that we dont know how to do now.

PoseidonDiver
Автор

The inner layers of the Great Pyramid were built on a pre-existing hillock. The stones were rough quarried and unfitted. Only the outer layers were dressed stone, and even they were coarse enough to require mortar. Composite construction would be labor prohibitive. Pounding that much limestone into powder would have been much more work than just splitting blocks in a quarry.

Demobius
Автор

The only thing that never adds up is apparently the ancient Egyptians didn’t have the tools to quarry the granite yet build Egyptians pyramids, labyrinths, and libraries, etc… perfectly aligned to the Orin Star constellations, exactly on the 30th parallel.
Also 7 geologist state in their studies that the sphinx has thousands of years of rain and water weathering which would date the building of sphinx and great pyramids to 11, 500 years ago not 4, 500 which the only tools found were copper and dolerite rocks 🪨

DammDamian
Автор

you are missing something, it is wrong to say we can recreate today the stone vase, marble breccia is no more than 4 on mohs scale, the granite vases and porphyry cannot be shape perfectly by hands please refer to uncharted x video on precision, also all granite blocks cannot be made by hands

al
Автор

6:05... why is the dialogue seemingly separating Kemet from Africa when it is all one and the same continent? Saying "Africans" moved northward into Kemet is like saying "Americans" moved northward into New York... they were/are all "Africans". Okay, I see near the end the statement is made that the "Africans of Kemet" achieved these awesome feats. Very good documentary, thank you for sharing!

anvayelbenephraim
Автор

When you lie about one thing the rest isn't true

melvinjefferson
Автор

The one flaw in the polymer theory is the lack of bonding between the layers and individual blocks

stephenfowler
Автор

Great presentation on how many of the ancient Egyptian structures and antiquities were most likely created starting with the pre Dynastic Eras up through the Dynastic Periods. Glad it was noted the various objects and structures predated Mesopotamia.

thaliahall
Автор

This technique does not explain how the kailash temple was carved from a mountaintop down.

pudutablet-velt