There's a MASSIVE difference between BF4 vehicles you didn't know about - Battlefield 4

preview_player
Показать описание
Totally got the thumbnail from TBAG

► Liked this video? consider subscribing :)

Hi, im DANNYonPC, i play videogames, i do awesome stuff in them and at times break it!
(Mostly Battlefield)

► Here are some of my favorite videos!

I like cookies! Do you?

So who am i? i'm DANNYonPC and upload Battlefield gameplay of new maps and other stuff, i also update you about new tides of war rewards, patches and more
from games like battlefield v / bf5, battlefield 1, or even older games like bf4 and bf3
Also opinionated short form content
#Battlefield #BattlefieldV #battlefield6 #Battlefield2021 #Battlefield1
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

i might have taken a bit longer than expected with this video

DANNYonPC
Автор

This is why a lot of servers play US-US, to bore us all with monotony of EXACT BALANCE

darthveda
Автор

I knew it was going to be an annoying round when I saw US v US on Littlebird Maps.

abr
Автор

I like these little differences. Adds more flavour to the factions. PS: bring back factions DICE

favclassisspy
Автор

I'd much rather play with small vehicle imbalances than the clone wars of 2042 and BF4 nowadays. This stuff only matters for high level comp play and shouldn't affect the average player.

mrCeal
Автор

Neat how real world features and designs of vehicles helps balance them against each other in addition with damage models and hp

thestørmcrier
Автор

So this was why I was good with the LAV on a round.

LAV-A_
Автор

The BTR-90 is actually better than the LAV-25. The turret is in the front meaning you can expose less of your vehicle.

imnotusingmyrealname
Автор

It's little balance shenanigans like this that create a near-timeless masterpiece of skill curve to overcome.

GG, old DICE.

msaeedazizi
Автор

Another reason the q5 is the best attack jet is because of its canopy. You can see more compared to the a10 and su25.

The only advantage the j20 has is also its canopy is able to see much easier compared to the other two.

Also he forgot to mention with the lavad you can travel on water much easier compared to the tunguska and type 95 aa

MonaxNoire
Автор

Short - it makes sense only in competitive match.
BF is about larglely immersion and vehicles have to look and act different.

chaimkobylinski
Автор

I think it would be better if the different faction vehicles were completely different, in handling and weapons and such. Keep it balanced by having the vehicles different enough to were one isn’t objectively better than its other faction counterpart.

saladv
Автор

I thought F-35 being able to hover and BTR + RCB boat having turret at the front were only differences. I thought helis had different agility but I thought that was just me

michaelpontifex
Автор

Sumo wrestling is one of my favorite things to do with tanks. Didn't realize the advntage thay the Abrams has, but it makes sense.

desreversti
Автор

BTR-90 have less height, so you can enter tiny spaces where LAV-25 or ZBD will stuck on the ceiling

CogumeloLokaco
Автор

forgot to mention the difference in the exit point from the attack helicopter, which prevents you from dropping the spot or making a switch with a gunner on the havoc

psimera-gaming
Автор

Battlefield 4 gameplay is till the king and all we really want is just an upgraded bf4😭😭

butterhead
Автор

Yeah this is why most good servers were US vs US

AKKI
Автор

im never going to stop playing this game.

Stunlokked
Автор

Me and my homies hate US v US servers frfr

weehoo