Aspen (Alkylate fuel) vs Euro 95 (Regular petrol)

preview_player
Показать описание
This is what Euro 95 will do to your diaphragms, fuel lines and gaskets, when you leave the fuel inside for more than 2 weeks. While Aspen 2 (Alkylate fuel) is not doing this, not even after 5 years.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So if you want to burn polystyrene, you should use regular 2 stroke.

EricaMTB
Автор

your or anyone else’s engine or parts of engine ie hoses does not contain polystyrene, you just found something that dissolves in Petrol and not in aspen,

seanarbor
Автор

Irrelevant test, although I prefer Aspen. Lasts longer and does not have that nauseating smell.

morikanteyekeyeke
Автор

Jag köp alla mina maskin på miljöbensin atv också

magnusolsson
Автор

Aspen har bara 87 oktan och e10 95 oktan så det är inte konstigt att frigolit försvinner

magnusolsson
Автор

Really don't put 2 stroke fuel like Aspen in your car. Your car is not made for that. As opposed to normal fuel, your filters, gaskets and engine might get ruined!

mirar
Автор

I'd rather buy a new machine every 3 years with the money I saved by using regular petrol.

hvt_andreas
Автор

Since when do they make fuel components out of styrofoam?🤣🤣🤣

NoticeablyFxAxT
Автор

Yes Aspen is better for everything, enviroment, fuel lines, diaphragms....but it's stupidly expensive. Also your naughty little trick was the kind of suggestive 'Not Quite Correct' information that the Advertising Standards Authority here in the UK put a stop to years ago. I came here to learn something...you taught me how to fry polystyrene in an aggressive solvent. Something we did as apprentices.

Have Down thumb for being half honest.

People, Buy Aspen because it's good for your engines...not because it's harmless to Polystyrene nuggets. If you can afford it.

Cheap trick..😡.

grassblade