Part 3 of 3: How to Prove an Omission during Cross Examination in a Trial with illustration

Extracting a Contradiction is the art of the cross-examiner and there is method to prove the contradiction in a trial. In the first video I will explain what is Contradiction and when omission can amount to Contradiction in a trial. Bringing out the inconsistencies in the deposition can help in impeaching the credibility of the witness and plays important role in evaluating the evidence. In the second Video I will explain how to prove a contradiction in a trial and will show what is the method and technique to first bring the contradiction on record and thereafter how to prove it during Cross examination. In the third video I will show how to prove Omission which amounts to contradiction as first the omission will have to be converted into a contradiction and then it can be proved. If there are any doubts please your questions in the comment section.

[jagrutysevak]

Very well expained Jeet. You are so articulate. Keep up the good work