Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger! (CNET's FULL Interview)

The US's largest chipmaker has lost ground to Asian rivals. A chip engineer is leading the effort to catch up.

[nakoz]

This guy is passionate, a passion for what you do is the best stimulant to the success I believe in Pat I believe in Intel.

[MarsorryIckuatuna]

This is the interview I needed to hear to get some confidence back in Intel. Very well spoken - the future looks good. All the best to him and the team!

[TheFishingNomad]

I like this guy. Makes me feel even better about my investment in INTC.

[cctan]

As an ex Intellier when Andy Grove was still CEO, I am finally excited for Intel again. I was disheartened the last decade seeing where this iconic company was heading. With Pat back on board, I am very optimistic that Intel will get back its mojo. All the best to you, Pat !!!

[acemav]

This road sounds familiar. Like Apple back then when it was losing relevancy. Look at where they are now. Won't be surprised with all the metaverse and self driving narrative, Intel will innovate tremendously with an engineer with a history in Intel.

[fkfms]

Go Pat & Intel 💪. Outsourcing critical manufacturing is never ever a good idea.

[ArpanMukhopadhyay]

coool! I am an AMD guy mostly, but I love all companies tech. I love Pat!! I want Intel to be back!

[jonasmanuel]

This was a great interview.
Great and at times hard questions from the interviewer and Pat did not try avoid any of them

[BrianKehm]

Great to see this and other insight from Pat. I've invested in INTC and might be doubling down soon.

[kosnowman]

I am watching this interview with M1 Air, but this guy is not an accountant, a craftsman mindset of building better product rather than cutting cost.
I think Intel is in a good hands

[fturla___]

What I like about the latest Intel work ethic in top management is that they aren't trying or pushing their marketing and financing arms to do the leg work for making the company more money. That attitude is representative of management and businesses that are mature and no longer have innovation in the basics of industrial improvements to the business. We saw that aspect in the last decade with Intel and that dropped their reputation and made them lose their spot as the top dog. Hopefully Intel actually does some real work in the field and stops slacking off.

[cartman]

I got kind of similar vibes from him that I got 2014 from lisa su at amd. I bought stocks for 10k which grow to basicly 200k. Since the intel stock are very cheap I going to buy for 25k

[emmanueloluga]

Pat does sort of has the same vibe as Noyce in some instances. Great move by Intel to finally see the light.

[ytdlgandalf]

By being so self critical for Intel's last 10 years it's almost unamerican. I expected politically correct, oil-snaky remarks. This bodes well for intel

[neilcameron]

Go Pat! 30% of my pension savings depend on you. No pressure!

[harv]

Intel became dull becuz finance guy was incharge of technology but it feels like intel is in right hands again 👍 this interview makes me wanna buy more INTC at these extreme low prices

[mahkhi]

He's Gordon Moore's Son. Doing the Same thing. A Charade.

[j]

It could be argued wall street created your problem with stock buy backs and quite a healthy dividend. If you dropped the dividend and invested it into R&D and fabs I, would still buy the stock.

[marshabonforte]

Pat is inspiring, and he makes a great brand ambassador

[alalfred]

I own INTL for close to 30 years and it is not a good investment. It has squandered its chip leadership position. TSMC is two generations ahead of Intel on the latest chip produced. Galsinger wants to get Intel back but also wants to use your and my money to subsidize Intel while disadvantaging TSMC. As a share holder, I appreciate what he is proposing, but erecting government policy to protect losers is not a sound and wise use of national resources, especially in technology area. Both TSMC and Samsung are investing billions of dollars in Arizona and Texas to build chip production plants using technology more advanced than Intel’s. We should have policies betting on multiple horses as long as they are willing to invest in USA.