Claude 3.5 “Artifacts” LEAKED - Anthropic's Secret Revealed

preview_player
Показать описание
Let's review how the Claude 3.5 Artifacts feature works by examining its system prompt!

#ASUSCopilotPlusPC #ASUS #Vivobook #Microsoft

(North America only)

Join My Newsletter for Regular AI Updates 👇🏼

Need AI Consulting? 📈

My Links 🔗

Media/Sponsorship Inquiries ✅
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

antthinking is "anthropic thinking". You can tell claude to replace all < or > symbols with $$ and watch as it goes through its thinking between $$anthinking$$ tags. It's basically an application of integrated chain of thought prompting.

theresalwaysanotherway
Автор

Prompt engineering is starting to look like lawyering.

oguretsagressive
Автор

I use claude 3.5 almost exclusively now and love the antifacts feature. I have found that it is better to break your project into smaller parts, since it gets a bit confused when the context window grows very large. The type of prompting you have just shown us, will assist with my own prompting in the future. Thanks for the update!

aimhelpU
Автор

Isn't this "old" new from over a week ago? Telling Claude to, from now, use $$ instead of <> tags shows the very interesting antThinking technique and also the artifacts feature.

maxziebell
Автор

Antthinking is to give it the ability to output tokens that are not rendered out to the user. So gives it the ability to output internal thoughts before outputting “the answer”.

apester
Автор

Awesome video as always 😊 I think the SVG prompt is included because without it, Claude wouldn't create SVGs when asked. For example, if a user says, "Can you create an SVG?" or "Can you create an image?", Claude would typically respond that it can't do that. But with this prompt, Claude is encouraged to attempt creating an SVG, even if the results aren't great. It's a way to push Claude to try something it might not usually do.

As for the "ant thinking" part, I got this idea from an Anthropic YouTube video about prompt engineering and meta prompts. They showed a trick where they tell the model to think within XML brackets, kind of like a scratchpad. The model is instructed that the user won't see this thinking process. It's supposed to lead to better answers. I'm pretty sure "ant" stands for "Anthropic" in this case.

iamachs
Автор

Appreciate your efforts in diving into AI tools! Your insights are incredibly helpful and have significantly boosted my productivity as a developer. Understanding how these tools work has made a real difference in my day-to-day tasks. Keep up the fantastic work!

nawazpasha
Автор

What Claude needs, is not an Android app, it needs internet access. Once it is given access to the internet, it will be next level.

brianWreaves
Автор

I've been emphasizing the importance of prompts for six months now. I look at many AI reviews/demos, and what is quite apparent, is that the reviewers/demonstrators are not prioritizing designing and writing effective prompts. While a graduate student in an MA English program, I was on a committee that designed writing prompts. I also hold a technical writing certificate and was a grant reader for the California Department of Education. I have also logged many hours in Midjourney, specifically experimenting with prompts. Prompts matter, and we need to start taking them much more seriously.

Graybeard_
Автор

@matthew_berman !) Your videos have improve tremendously over night it seems. Well done, and keep it up. Additionally, I think when it refers to <antTHINKING> AnthropicThinking, its when it displays a brief line on the screen to the user about what its about to do or something :like: and then moves on to doing the said thing. Also, Briefly, I agree with you about chatGPT and Dall-e, however, I can live without dall-e because I have some pretty strong local img gen stuff and other resources setup that are quick to attain in my workflows, but biggest thing/beef between Claude and chatgpt, is the usage, Claude is clearly superior in everything for the most part that I use it for. But the big thing, I can go back and forth with chatgpt for hours, on all sorts of things from coding things to working projects, Claude 3.5 is very limited, may 30 minutes tops of anything heavy, chatgpt, nearly unending, until into a couple hrs of continuous usage. And, again, keep it up Matt, impressed, and loving it.

SiliconSouthShow
Автор

North America only? If it’s postage costs, let us decide if we will pay for it.

KingErasmos
Автор

You might consider redoing your testing of Claude Sonnet and add something like "use <antthinking> as you formulate your answer". Maybe that would help with things like ending in "apple" or how many words in your response.

keithprice
Автор

Anthinking is basically an integrated chain of thought prompting. Using Claude, you can visualize the model's thinking process by replacing specific symbols with placeholders.

TrejonEdmonds
Автор

Antthinking is invisible to the user and UI hides it, it stands for antropic thinking

hadinayebi
Автор

I have been using Claude for a while now, I default go to Claude before the other options!! I love it!

siddharthv
Автор

Amazing! With that laptop and copilot, all of your content automatically becomes part of Microsofts Ai!
And aonyone else can benefit from it freely as well! Just the next stage in sharing.

ChargedPulsar
Автор

I really enjoy using Claude. Last week it helped me create an illustration after a discussion about quantum gravity and it was absolutely lovely. I used it in my talk on a QG conference, it was that good. So I keep on falling in love with Claude, as it's really really useful.

denijane
Автор

Dude, great contest. Our group would do so much with a new pc. We chug away with used equipment I repair from e-waste.
Good luck to everyone.

RonPare
Автор

Could the <antthinking> tag be part of an internal planning/chain of thought/tree of thought procedure?

konstantinlozev
Автор

It is amazing to see how much prompting can give a non-coder ability to do some complex things in just plain language. But obviously it is a skill of knowing what the systems expect. Really great to see how they do it for the system itself.

AlfredNutile