State of the Race: Final polls and path to the White House

Harris and Trump still neck-and-neck in final polls as campaign reaches finish line

[edwardl.blount]

I love how they make these numbers up for viewers. No one with a brain believes these clowns.

[nitromartini]

Tight my ass. Nobody takes ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS or CNN seriously.

[RoblEsquire]

I don't believe any poll this channel puts up!

[MissJIntuitiveTarot]

2.1 is a little bit more? Your polls are way off.

[johnb]

Propagandists. Didn't learn from msDNC and CNN.

[H-Town_]

Why do they keep showing national polls? It's only the battle grounds that matter.

[jayyjay]

🚨 BLM leader Mark Fisher is voting for PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP saying "We’ve just been blindly loyal to the Democratic Party for no reason, ” as per New York Post Nov 4, 2024.

[jameskirk]

I never voted for Harris because of her complete failure as a V.P.

[tipsygypsy]

You will lose your broadcasting liscense because of your your lies and bias

[jackedwards]

I wouldn't believe ABC on stack of bibles that reach to heaven.

[lesterwatson]

It would take an idiot to vote for harris after the last four years of failure.

[donniepierce]

Keep showing those fake polls it's beyond cringe 😂

[danledbetter]

Amazing that 50 years ago we counted the votes on election day/evening, today with all of our technology it takes us day's or longer to count the vote!

[hummingbirdcity]

I love how every election, every time is magically this close, almost like a reality show.

[danysanta]

They wish these were the final results 😂

[StarSpangledShimmer]

We are DONE with your lies. Trump 2024🇺🇲 baby

[soliloquy]

This is the comment section I was hoping for 😂

[tricky]

I love how Kamala has to get a handful of states and trump has to paint 90 percent of the map red to call it close

[accent]

Trump is going to win Pennsylvania for sure.

[iamobtainment]

You realize The probability of having five consecutive close elections, each within a margin of 1-2%, if we assume a 5% chance of a close result in any given election, is approximately 0.000031% (or 3.1 in 10 million). This extremely low probability does suggest that having multiple consecutive "neck-and-neck" elections is highly unlikely to occur purely by chance in an honest system.

If elections consistently result in such close outcomes, it raises valid questions about the integrity of the process, suggesting that other factors—whether they are intentional manipulation, systemic biases, or undetected irregularities—could be influencing the results. The math alone shows that the consistent closeness of elections is improbable without external factors at play. ​