'Godfather of AI' Just Gave a WARNING On The Scary Future Of Employment

0:00 Hinton Introduction
1:24 Google Resignation
2:32 Industrial Revolution
3:55 White Collar
5:22 Job Evolution
7:49 Customer Service
9:00 Anthropic Perspective
10:45 AI Progress
12:30 Wealth Distribution
13:27 Altman's Warning
15:55 Future Work
17:47 Physical Jobs
19:22 Human Skills
20:53 Future Solutions
22:25 Final Thoughts

Links From Todays Video:

Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on my latest videos.

Was there anything i missed?

#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience

[JuliaMcCoy]

In the Industrial Revolution, human strength was made irrelevant. In the technology era, human intelligence is now made irrelevant. - Hinton 🤯

[lppoqql]

The world needs a certain level of social fairness

[MR_THINQ]

My son is a software engineer and I’ve warned him about this, in 10 years time his job won’t exist.

Software engineers will be just code overseers, human coders will be a rarity.

[GearForTheYear]

I don’t think human-to-human interaction is going to go up, I think human-to-AI interaction is going to go up…

[dianasong]

Basically this world doesn't need many human beings in the future.

[EmeraldView]

When A.I. makes the pipes and other plumbing much better (such that it's far less likely to break), then what will plumbers do?

And of course it's only a matter of time before it makes robots so dexterous and capable that it can replace even plumbers.

[xxsbxx]

"What machines can't do" Literally all of these with the exception of dexterity should be doable by AI within 5 years, 10 years at absolute max. I'm baffled at the fact that there's 64% of experts who genuinely think AI can't surpass humans in communication. Absolutely delusional.

[SimonJonathanThorpe]

UBI is clearly the solution here. Imagine that everyone on the planet was paid a minimum of$100 a month - more in more affluent nations. The amount would need to be set so that someone with no other income could get by - even when the jobs go. In such a system, AI and robots could progressively replace paid work without the risk of people starving to death. Instead, if people have the choice of doing no paid work, but living a more frugal lifestyle - growing their own food, for example - they could decide to work just enough to provide the additional income they need. There would be no need for everyone to work 40 hour weeks. Some people would do no paid work, whereas others may decide to work 1 or 2 days a week, one week a month, one month a year or whatever. And to get pople to do the really tricky and unpleasant stuff (like plumbing and unblocking sewers), employers would have to pay way more than they do now. Sounds pretty much like a Utopia to me. But we need that UBI now. We can't wait for civil war to break out.

[aroemaliuged]

If you don’t know who Geoff Hinton is
You aren’t interested in ai

[MR_THINQ]

It’s just a matter of time that we will see the first ai CEO.

[notimportant]

Yea we also adamantly believed everyone would be in self driving cars by 2030... and look how that panned out. Furthermore most of the ppl propagating these claims are people who directly benefit from the adoption of AI. My point is you gotta take what these ppl say with a huge grain of salt. I work as a CAM engineer for a circuit board shop, my job should be at extreme risk of being taken over by AI if you take what these tech bros are saying at face value but the reality is these AI tools dont possesess any inherent intelligence whatsoever, these tools are highly sophisticated pattern recognition tools, they generate a response based on a huge array of data. You can replace a bunch of repetitive, monotone jobs such as data entry with AI quite easily but the moment an AI comes across any use case that has one iota of complexity to it, in other words things that require any critical thought, the AI will generate a useless solution. So please stop with this AI fear mongering, unless you are a data entry clerk or the lowest of the low levels of coders you have nothing to fear

[xbshp]

Go try to build something highly complex with just prompting and zero knowledge of software, security, networking, etc, etc. You'll get garbage. I've quite enjoyed finding vulns in all the "applications" people are deploying though.

Also, what people don't seem to be talking about enough is how much energy it's going to take to "replace everybody". They're going to have to get nuclear power approved and reactors built. That isn't something that will happen quickly.

[camilo]

More than: Making Inteligence irrelevant or Replacing Intelligence (That the word inteligence is a really complex thing to simplify it like that), AGI, is more about replacing the average human being, making the average human being worthless, the only thing that will be forever save is greatness and excepcionlity, those humans are the ones that are going to take an advantage over AGI by not needing the crowd anymore, those ones are going to achieve unvelievable things, a really amazing time is near. (If you dont understand this, dont worry, go and have fun while you can).

[ppragman]

This is going to be a lot better than most people think. As the cost of everything plummets it is going to get extremely awesome.

[EmeraldView]

Of course A.I. will replace most jobs. Why wouldn't it. Smarter, better, faster. And with A.I. improved and enhanced robotics. Forget about it.

[sergey]

The reason why robots are falling far behind LLM's is interaction of hardware with our world. With so many now developing robotic platforms, progress in simulation, this gap will be shrinking. The question is whether a current "10-year lag" will convert in a 1-year lag in 3 years and whether it will justify keeping blue collars around.

[artscollab]

Geoffrey Hinton has been saying this for *years*.

[moderncontemplative]

Geoffrey Hinton is on point by pointing out elastic jobs (nursing, MD, Psychologists, therapists, massage therapists…) being more safe than non-elastic jobs (much of entry and junior level cognitive based work). In any case, governments and tech companies aren’t ready for AGI! Why? AI is improving faster than the rate of Moore’s Law and companies are focused on being the best instead of preparing for complete automation with just a few experts in the loop versus many humans in the loop; and governments are comprised of mostly old non-tech savy folk. We still have time to prepare but the sands of time is running out!

[dafunkyzee]

You do know that my grandfather back in 1910 was talking about UBI.... this is really really really not a new idea... and as it hasn't come in back then... I strongly don't believe that it will be coming in anytime soon... I don't think UBI is viable, but rather it is a social pacifier. In addition, it sounds far far far far too much like the welfare system. If you have ever been on it, it is exceptionally psychologically damaging.

[I-Dophler]

A Chartered Surveyor's role involves complex physical assessments, professional judgment, and human interaction that AI can't easily replace. Here's why:

1. Physical presence is essential - surveyors need to:
- Physically inspect properties and land
- Assess building conditions in person
- Notice subtle issues that might not be visible in data or images
- Use their senses (sight, touch, smell) to detect problems

2. Professional judgment matters:
- Each property is unique and requires contextual understanding
- Local knowledge and experience are crucial
- Complex decisions need human expertise
- Understanding client needs and negotiating

3. Legal and professional responsibility:
- Surveyors carry professional indemnity insurance
- They're personally accountable for their assessments
- Professional qualifications and standards must be maintained

While AI might help surveyors with data analysis, measurements, and report writing, it's a tool to enhance their work, not replace it. The combination of physical inspection, professional judgment, and human interaction in surveying makes it one of those professions where AI will augment rather than replace human expertise.